• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Two great Computerworld articles on pandemic preparedness

Very good article from Computerworld's Robert Mitchell on pandemic preparedness for IT professionals and why it is important to take the threat seriously.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=277375

Preface to the interview with Dr. Osterholm and a somewhat contrarian view (!) from CDC economist Martin Meltzer.
http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/4305

Interview with Osterholm and CDC economist Meltzer.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9007058
 
Re: Two great Computerworld articles on pandemic preparedness

"the probability of an outbreak this year can?t be predicted with certainty. "

ahh...

I didn't know, that a probability can be "predicted" or even
can be "predicted with certainty".
Do they mean e.g. the probability to win the lottery ?
Everyone will tell the same number, so there is agreement here.

But that doesn't mean that individual probability estimates
of harder predictable events like a pandemic don't exist.
They would differ, sure. But that's no excuse to refuse
telling it.
Meltzer and Osterholm and others could make their language
and communication efforts much more effective by giving
their numbers.
They don't want this. They want to remain unclear. Why ?
 
Re: Two great Computerworld articles on pandemic preparedness

Thanks for the links. I left a comment in the Preface Interview with our 30 Day Stockpile info. :D
 
Back
Top