• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Turk J Emerg Med . Randomized controlled trials of remdesivir in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Turk J Emerg Med


. 2021 Feb 12;21(2):43-50.
doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.309139. eCollection Apr-Jun 2021.
Randomized controlled trials of remdesivir in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A meta-analysis


Azza Sarfraz[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Zouina Sarfraz[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Marcos Sanchez-Gonzalez[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jack Michel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], George Michel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Odalys Frontela[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jorge Posada[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jose Cardona[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eugenio Angueira[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The first cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were reported in Wuhan, China. No antiviral treatment options are currently available with proven clinical efficacy. However, preliminary findings from phase III trials suggest that remdesivir is an effective and safe treatment option for COVID-19 patients with both moderate and severe disease.
Objective: The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate whether remdesivir was effective for treating COVID-19 including reduced in-hospital adverse events, oxygen support, and mortality rates.
Methods: According to the PRISMA reporting guidelines, a review was conducted from January 1, 2020, until August 25, 2020, with MeSH terms including COVID-19, COVID, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, remdesivir, adenosine nucleoside triphosphate analog, and Veklury using MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus. A modified Delphi process was utilized to include the studies and ensure that the objectives were addressed. Using dichotomous data for select values, the unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated applying Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method in Review Manager 5.4.
Results: Randomized controlled trials pooled in 3013 participants with 46.3% (n = 1395) in the remdesivir group and 53.7% (n = 1618) in the placebo group. The placebo group had a higher risk of mortality as compared to the intervention group with significant OR (0.61) (95% confidence interval of 0.45-0.82; P = 0.001). There was minimal heterogeneity among the studies (I [SUP]2[/SUP] = 0%).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that remdesivir extends clinical benefits by reducing mortality, adverse events, and oxygen support in moderate to severely ill COVID-19 patients. Concerted efforts and further randomized placebo-controlled trials are warranted to examine the potency of antiviral drugs and immunopathological host responses contributing to the severity of COVID-19.

Keywords: Coronavirus; Veklury; emergency use authorization; hospitalized; remdesivir.
 
Back
Top Bottom