tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Jun 29:1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818001772. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Transmission routes of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09: analyses of inflight outbreaks.[/h] Lei H[SUP]1[/SUP], Tang JW[SUP]2[/SUP], Li Y[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Knowledge about the infection transmission routes is significant for developing effective intervention strategies. We searched the PubMed databases and identified 10 studies with 14 possible inflight influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 outbreaks. Considering the different mechanisms of the large-droplet and airborne routes, a meta-analysis of the outbreak data was carried out to study the difference in attack rates for passengers within and beyond two rows of the index case(s). We also explored the relationship between the attack rates and the flight duration and/or total infectivity of the index case(s). The risk ratios for passengers seated within and beyond the two rows of the index cases were 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.84) for syndromic secondary cases and 4.3 (95% CI 1.25-14.54) for laboratory-confirmed secondary cases. Furthermore, with an increase of the product of the flight duration and the total infectivity of the index cases, the overall attack rate increased linearly. The study indicates that influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 may mainly be transmitted via the airborne route during air travel. A standardised approach for the reporting of such inflight outbreak investigations would help to provide more convincing evidence for such inflight transmission events.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Airborne route; inflight outbreaks; influenza; meta-analysis
PMID: 29954469 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818001772
[h=1]Transmission routes of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09: analyses of inflight outbreaks.[/h] Lei H[SUP]1[/SUP], Tang JW[SUP]2[/SUP], Li Y[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Knowledge about the infection transmission routes is significant for developing effective intervention strategies. We searched the PubMed databases and identified 10 studies with 14 possible inflight influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 outbreaks. Considering the different mechanisms of the large-droplet and airborne routes, a meta-analysis of the outbreak data was carried out to study the difference in attack rates for passengers within and beyond two rows of the index case(s). We also explored the relationship between the attack rates and the flight duration and/or total infectivity of the index case(s). The risk ratios for passengers seated within and beyond the two rows of the index cases were 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.84) for syndromic secondary cases and 4.3 (95% CI 1.25-14.54) for laboratory-confirmed secondary cases. Furthermore, with an increase of the product of the flight duration and the total infectivity of the index cases, the overall attack rate increased linearly. The study indicates that influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 may mainly be transmitted via the airborne route during air travel. A standardised approach for the reporting of such inflight outbreak investigations would help to provide more convincing evidence for such inflight transmission events.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Airborne route; inflight outbreaks; influenza; meta-analysis
PMID: 29954469 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818001772