• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Transl Pediatr . Clinical features and outcomes of influenza by virus type/subtype/lineage in pediatric patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Transl Pediatr


. 2021 Jan;10(1):54-63.
doi: 10.21037/tp-20-196.
Clinical features and outcomes of influenza by virus type/subtype/lineage in pediatric patients


Seung Beom Han[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jung-Woo Rhim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jin Han Kang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kyung-Yil Lee[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Recently, four influenza viruses are circulating worldwide: A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata. However, information on the clinical differences among pediatric patients infected with four recently circulating influenza viruses is sparse.
Methods: Medical records of pediatric patients (<20 years of age) diagnosed with influenza between the 2014-2015 and 2018-2019 influenza seasons were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features were compared between (I) patients infected with influenza A (FluA) and influenza B (FluB) viruses, (II) patients infected with FluA when A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) circulated dominantly, and (III) patients infected with FluB when B/Victoria and B/Yamagata circulated dominantly.
Results: A total of 1,588 patients infected with FluA and 964 patients infected with FluB were included in this study. Patients infected with FluB were older (P<0.001) and more likely to report sore throat (P=0.002) than those infected with FluA. Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the clinical symptoms, diagnoses, and outcomes between patients infected with FluA and FluB. Overall, clinical features of influenza patients were similar regardless of the dominantly circulated subtype and lineage of the virus. In children aged ≤2 years, patients infected with FluB were more like to experience lower respiratory tract infection (P=0.034) and hospitalization (P=0.001) than those infected with FluA.
Conclusions: There were no significant clinical differences among pediatric patients infected with four recently circulating influenza viruses, except that FluB infection tended to be more severe than FluA infection in children aged ≤2 years.

Keywords: Influenza; children; influenza A virus; influenza B virus.
 
Back
Top Bottom