• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Transfusion . Use of a rapid electronic survey methodology to estimate blood donors' potential exposure to emerging infectious diseases: Applicatio

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Transfusion


. 2020 Aug 3.
doi: 10.1111/trf.15941. Online ahead of print.
Use of a rapid electronic survey methodology to estimate blood donors' potential exposure to emerging infectious diseases: Application of a statistically representative sampling methodology to assess risk in US blood centers


Barbee I Whitaker[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mark Walderhaug[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Susan Hinkins[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Whitney R Steele[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brian Custer[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Debra Kessler[SUP] 5 [/SUP], German Leparc[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jerome L Gottschall[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Walter Bialkowski[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Susan L Stramer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Roger Y Dodd[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lauren Crowder[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Farnaz Vahidnia[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Beth H Shaz[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hany Kamel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mark Rebosa[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Michael Stern[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Steven A Anderson[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Risk assessments of transfusion-transmitted emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are complicated by the fact that blood donors' demographics and behaviors can be different from the general population. Therefore, when assessing potential blood donor exposure to EIDs, the use of general population characteristics, such as U.S. travel statistics, may invoke uncertainties that result in inaccurate estimates of blood donor exposure. This may, in turn, lead to the creation of donor deferral policies that do not match actual risk.
Study design and methods: This article reports on the development of a system to rapidly assess EID risks for a nationally representative portion of the U.S. blood donor population. To assess the effectiveness of this system, a test survey was developed and deployed to a statistically representative sample frame of blood donors from five blood collecting organizations. Donors were directed to an online survey to ascertain their recent travel and potential exposure to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).
Results: A total of 7128 responses were received from 54 256 invitations. The age-adjusted estimated total number of blood donors potentially exposed to MERS-CoV was approximately 15 640 blood donors compared to a lower U.S. general population-based estimate of 9610 blood donors.
Conclusion: The structured donor demographic sample-based data provided an assessment of blood donors' potential exposure to an emerging pathogen that was 63% larger than the U.S. population-based estimate. This illustrates the need for tailored blood donor-based EID risk assessments that provide more specific demographic risk intelligence and can inform appropriate regulatory decision making.
 
Back
Top Bottom