• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Transbound Emerg Dis . A review of estimated transmission parameters for the spread of avian influenza viruses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Transbound Emerg Dis


. 2022 Aug 12.
doi: 10.1111/tbed.14675. Online ahead of print.
A review of estimated transmission parameters for the spread of avian influenza viruses


Carsten Kirkeby[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael P Ward[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Avian influenza poses an increasing problem in Europe and around the world. Simulation models are a useful tool to predict the spatiotemporal risk of avian influenza spread, and evaluate appropriate control actions. To develop realistic simulation models, valid transmission parameters are critical. Here we reviewed published estimates of the basic reproduction number (R[SUB]0[/SUB] ), the latent period and the infectious period by virus type, pathogenicity, species, study type and poultry flock unit. We found a large variation in the parameter estimates, with highest R[SUB]0[/SUB] estimates for H5N1 and H7N3 compared to other types; for low pathogenic avian influenza compared to high pathogenic avian influenza types; for ducks compared to other species; for estimates from field studies compared to experimental studies; and for within-flock estimates compared to between-flock estimates. Simulation models should reflect this observed variation so as to produce more reliable outputs and support decision-making. How to incorporate this information into simulation models remains a challenge. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: avian influenza virus; mathematical model; poultry; simulation model; transmission.
 
Back
Top Bottom