• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Thromb Res . Venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Thromb Res


. 2020 Aug 12;196:67-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.08.020. Online ahead of print.
Venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis


Angelo Porfidia[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emanuele Valeriani[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Roberto Pola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ettore Porreca[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anne W S Rutjes[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Marcello Di Nisio[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may complicate the course of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of VTE in patients with COVID-19.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched up to 24th June 2020 for studies that evaluated the incidence of VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in patients with COVID-19. Pooled proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI) were calculated by random-effect meta-analysis.
Results: 3487 patients from 30 studies were included. Based on very low-quality evidence due to heterogeneity and risk of bias, the incidence of VTE was 26% (95% PI, 6%-66%). PE with or without DVT occurred in 12% of patients (95% PI, 2%-46%) and DVT alone in 14% (95% PI, 1%-75%). Studies using standard algorithms for clinically suspected VTE reported PE in 13% of patients (95% PI, 2%-57%) and DVT in 6% (95% PI, 0%-60%), compared to 11% (95% PI, 2%-46%) and 24% (95% PI, 2%-85%) in studies using other diagnostic strategies or patient sampling. In patients admitted to intensive care units, VTE occurred in 24% (95% PI, 5%-66%), PE in 19% (95% PI, 6%-47%), and DVT alone in 7% (95% PI, 0%-69%). Corresponding values in general wards were respectively 9% (95% PI, 0%-94%), 4% (95% PI, 0%-100%), and 7% (95% CI, 1%-49%).
Conclusions: VTE represents a frequent complication in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and often occurs as PE. The threshold for clinical suspicion should be low to trigger prompt diagnostic testing.

Keywords: Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Pulmonary embolism; SARS virus; Venous thromboembolism.
 
Back
Top Bottom