• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Throat swabs in children with respiratory tract infection: associations with clinical presentation and potential targets for point-of-care testing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 18. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw136. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Throat swabs in children with respiratory tract infection: associations with clinical presentation and potential targets for point-of-care testing.[/h] Thornton HV[SUP]1[/SUP], Hay AD[SUP]1[/SUP], Redmond NM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Turnbull SL[SUP]1[/SUP], Christensen H[SUP]3[/SUP], Peters TJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Leeming JP[SUP]5[/SUP], Lovering A[SUP]5[/SUP], Vipond B[SUP]6[/SUP], Muir P[SUP]6[/SUP], Blair PS[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]Background and objectives.:[/h] Diagnostic uncertainty over respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care contributes to over-prescribing of antibiotics and drives antibiotic resistance. If symptoms and signs predict respiratory tract microbiology, they could help clinicians target antibiotics to bacterial infection. This study aimed to determine relationships between symptoms and signs in children presenting to primary care and microbes from throat swabs.
[h=4]Methods.:[/h] Cross-sectional study of children ≥3 months to <16 years presenting with acute cough and RTI, with subset follow-up. Associations and area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) statistics sought between clinical presentation and baseline microbe detection. Microbe prevalence compared between baseline (symptomatic) and follow-up (asymptomatic) visits.
[h=4]Results.:[/h] At baseline, ≥1 bacteria was detected in 1257/2113 (59.5%) children and ≥1 virus in 894/2127 (42%) children. Clinical presentation was not associated with detection of ≥1 bacteria [AUROC 0.54 (95% CI 0.52-0.56)] or ≥1 virus [0.64 (95% CI 0.61-0.66)]. Individually, only respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was associated with clinical presentation [AUROC 0.80 (0.77-0.84)]. Prevalence fell between baseline and follow-up; more so in viruses (68% versus 26%, P < 0.001) than bacteria (56% versus 40%, P = 0.01); greatest reductions seen in RSV, influenza B and Haemophilus influenzae.
[h=4]Conclusion.:[/h] Findings demonstrate that clinical presentation cannot distinguish the presence of bacteria or viruses in the upper respiratory tract. However, individual and overall microbe prevalence was greater when children were unwell than when well, providing some evidence that upper respiratory tract microbes may be the cause or consequence of the illness. If causal, selective microbial point-of-care testing could be beneficial.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Bronchitis; common cold; diagnostic tests; laboratory; pediatrics; primary care; ultrasound; upper respiratory infections

PMID: 28334924 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw136
 
Back
Top Bottom