• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ther Adv Respir Dis . Prognostic factors and outcomes in COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ther Adv Respir Dis


. Jan-Dec 2022;16:17534666221086415.
doi: 10.1177/17534666221086415.
Prognostic factors and outcomes in COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study


Roman Melamed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Francisco Paz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stacy Jepsen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Claire Smith[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ramiro Saavedra[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maximilian Mulder[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Adnan Masood[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joshua Huelster[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lisa Kirkland[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alena Guenther[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lori Boland[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is associated with high mortality and extensive resource utilization. The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors and outcomes associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in COVID-19 patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive MV who were hospitalized between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2021 in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three referral hospitals belonging to a single health system. Data were extracted from electronic health records. PMV was defined as > 17 days of MV.
Results: Of 355 patients studied, 86 (24%) required PMV. PMV patients had lower PaO[SUB]2[/SUB]/FiO[SUB]2[/SUB] ratio, higher PCO[SUB]2[/SUB], and higher plateau and driving pressures during the first 2 weeks of MV than their short MV (SMV; ⩽ 17 days) counterparts. PMV patients received more proning, neuromuscular blockade, and tracheostomy, had longer ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and required discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility more frequently (all p < 0.001). Overall 30-day mortality was 43.9%, with no statistically significant difference between PMV and SMV groups. In PMV patients, smoking, Charlson comorbidity index > 6, and week 2 PaO[SUB]2[/SUB]/FiO[SUB]2[/SUB] ratio < 150 and plateau pressure ⩾ 30 were positively associated with 30-day mortality. In a multivariate model, results were directionally consistent with the univariate analysis but did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion: PMV is commonly required in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. Despite the higher need for critical care interventions and LOS, more than half of the PMV cohort survived to hospital discharge. Higher PaO[SUB]2[/SUB]/FiO[SUB]2[/SUB] ratio, lower plateau pressure, and fewer comorbidities appear to be associated with survival in this group.

Keywords: COVID-19 virus disease; intensive care units; length of stay; mechanical ventilation; respiratory failure.
 
Back
Top Bottom