• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The value of signs and symptoms in differentiating between bacterial, viral and mixed aetiology in patients with a community-acquired pneumonia

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Microbiol. 2013 Dec 16. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.067108-0. [Epub ahead of print]
The value of signs and symptoms in differentiating between bacterial, viral and mixed aetiology in patients with a community-acquired pneumonia.
Huijskens EG, Koopmans MP, Palmen FM, van Erkel AJ, Mulder PG, Rossen JW.
Author information
Abstract

Current diagnostics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) include testing for a wide range of pathogens, which is costly and not always informative. We compared clinical and laboratory parameters of patients with CAP caused by different groups of pathogens to evaluate the potential for targeted diagnostics and directed treatment. In a prospective study, between April 2008 and April 2009, adult patients with CAP were tested for the presence of a broad range of possible respiratory pathogens using bacterial cultures, PCR, urinary antigen testing and serology. Of 408 patients with CAP, pathogens were detected in 263 (64.5%) patients. S. pneumoniae and influenza A virus were the most frequently identified bacterial and viral pathogens, respectively. Age had a significant effect on the prediction of aetiology (p = 0.054), with an increase in the relative contribution of viruses with advancing age. Multivariate analyses showed further that presence of cough increased the likelihood of detecting a viral pathogen (OR 5.536 95%CI: 2.130-14.390), the presence of immunodeficiency decreased the likelihood of detecting a bacterial pathogen (OR 0.595 95%CI: 0.246-1.437), and an increase in pneumonia severity index score increased the likelihood of detecting a pathogen in general. Although several variables were independently associated with the detection of a pathogen group, there were no reliable clinical predictors to distinguish between aetiologies due to substantial overlap. Therefore, testing for common respiratory pathogens is still necessary to optimize treatment.
KEYWORDS:

Clinical microbiology, Diagnostic techniques, Molecular diagnostics, Respiratory infections, Viruses

PMID:
24344207
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24344207
 
Back
Top Bottom