• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The value of early diagnostic screens for the diagnosis of influenza A, B and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Lab. 2013;59(11-12):1239-45.
The value of early diagnostic screens for the diagnosis of influenza A, B and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections.
You L1, Chen H2, Han C3, Guo P2, Huo X3, Hu B4.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Rapid diagnosis of influenza virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections is of importance for therapeutic intervention. It was the aim of the study to evaluate screening tests for influenza A (Flu A), B (Flu B), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) infections in young patients admitted to the hospital.
METHODS:

522 children and juvenile patients were admitted to the hospital because of symptoms suspecting Flu A, B or M. pneumoniae infections. Gold Immunochromatography Assays were used to screen for Flu A and Flu B and rapid identification culturing with subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out at admission for identification of M. pneumoniae infections. Diagnoses were based upon seroconversion during the clinical course.
RESULTS:

In the current study, 26% of 522 patients were shown to be infected with Flu A and 77% had positive screens using the Gold Immunochromatography Assays. 19% of 522 patients were infected with Flu B as diagnosed by seroconversion and 89% were detected by the screen. The rapid identification culture showed that 169 of 522 patients were M. pneumoniae positive. The positive samples based on rapid identification showed negative and poor concordance with PCR tests. The consistency test between the two screening methods mentioned above showed higher kappa value in the children group than infant group.
CONCLUSIONS:

The results are in agreement with literature and indicate that in juvenile patients and children the screening efficiency was limited. PCR assays may be applied prior to evaluation of antibody titres in the case of M. pneumoniae infections confirming previous results. The pronounced effect of age on the outcome has to be taken into account for evaluation of the screening methods.

PMID:
24409657
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409657
 
Back
Top Bottom