• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The swine flu scam?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2010
Journal of Public Health 2010 32(3):296-297; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq059


Editorials
The swine flu scam?


Meirion R. Evans
Senior Lecturer in Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Regional Epidemiologist, Public Health Wales
There is a conspiracy theory about nearly everything. So claims that swine flu was a scam come as no surprise. ?This was a pandemic that never really was? according to Paul Flynn, MP who prepared a recent report on the flu pandemic for the Council of Europe.1 The report expresses alarm about the way the pandemic was handled. It criticizes the proportionality of the response and argues that over reaction led to waste of public money, distortion of public health priorities and unjustified fears about health risks. It identifies ?grave shortcomings? in the transparency of decision-making processes and concerns about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry. The World Health Organization (WHO) comes in for particular criticism for failing to publish the declarations of interest of members of its Emergency Committee, the group advising director general Dr Margaret Chan on the pandemic response.

...

http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/32/3/296?rss=1
 
Back
Top