• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The “Pet Effect” Paradox: Are Pets Really Good for People?

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...et-effect-paradox-are-pets-really-good-people


The “Pet Effect” Paradox: Are Pets Really Good for People?
What does the science really say about the impact of pets on human health?
Posted September 9, 2021 | Reviewed by Abigail Fagan

Key points

The "pet effect" is the idea that getting a companion animal will improve physical and mental health.
Like a growing number of studies, a large study from Tufts University found that pet owners were not better off than non-pet owners.
The reasons for the mismatch between what we believe about the positive impact of pets on our lives and actual research results are unclear...
 
Back
Top