• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The Lancet. Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children admitted to hospital in Cape Town, South Africa

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: The Lancet, full text: (LINK). Abstract, edited.]


The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Early Online Publication, 18 July 2011

doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70167-0
Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children admitted to hospital in Cape Town, South Africa: a descriptive study



Original Text

Prof Mark P Nicol PhD, Lesley Workman MSc, Washiefa Isaacs BSc, Jacinta Munro, Faye Black MBBCh, Brian Eley FCPaed, Catharina C Boehme MD, Widaad Zemanay PhD, Prof Heather J Zar PhD



Summary

Background

WHO recommends that Xpert MTB/RIF replaces smear microscopy for initial diagnosis of suspected HIV-associated tuberculosis or multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, but no data exist for its use in children. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children in an area with high tuberculosis and HIV prevalences.


Methods

In this prospective, descriptive study, we enrolled children aged 15 years or younger who had been admitted to one of two hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa, with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis between Feb 19, 2009, and Nov 30, 2010. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of MTB/RIF and concentrated, fluorescent acid-fast smear with a reference standard of liquid culture from two sequential induced sputum specimens (primary analysis).


Results

452 children (median age 19?4 months, IQR 11?1?46?2) had at least one induced sputum specimen; 108 children (24%) had HIV infection. 27 children (6%) had a positive smear result, 70 (16%) had a positive culture result, and 58 (13%) had a positive MTB/RIF test result. With mycobacterial culture as the reference standard, MTB/RIF tests when done on two induced sputum samples detected twice as many cases (75?9%, 95% CI 64?5?87?2) as did smear microscopy (37?9%, 25?1?50?8), detecting all of 22 smear-positive cases and 22 of 36 (61?1%, 44?4?77?8) smear-negative cases. For smear-negative cases, the incremental increase in sensitivity from testing a second specimen was 27?8% for MTB/RIF, compared with 13?8% for culture. The specificity of MTB/RIF was 98?8% (97?6?99?9). MTB/RIF results were available in median 1 day (IQR 0?4) compared with median 12 days (9?17) for culture (p<0?0001).


Interpretation

MTB/RIF testing of two induced sputum specimens is warranted as the first-line diagnostic test for children with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.


Funding
National Institutes of Health, the National Health Laboratory Service Research Trust, the Medical Research Council of South Africa, and Wellcome Trust.
- -------
 
Back
Top Bottom