Emily
Editor, Senior Moderator
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n627
The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability
Leaked documents show that some early commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech?s covid-19 vaccine had lower than expected levels of intact mRNA, prompting wider questions about how to assess this novel vaccine platform, writes Serena Tinari
As it conducted its analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine in December, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was the victim of a cyberattack.1 More than 40 megabytes of classified information from the agency?s review were published on the dark web, and several journalists?including from The BMJ?and academics worldwide were sent copies of the leaks. They came from anonymous email accounts and most efforts to interact with the senders were unsuccessful. None of the senders revealed their identity, and the EMA says it is pursuing a criminal investigation.
The BMJ has reviewed the documents, which show that regulators had major concerns over unexpectedly low quantities of intact mRNA in batches of the vaccine developed for commercial production.
EMA scientists tasked with ensuring manufacturing quality?the chemistry, manufacturing, and control aspects of Pfizer?s submission to the EMA?worried about ?truncated and modified mRNA species present in the finished product.? Among the many files leaked to The BMJ, an email dated 23 November by a high ranking EMA official outlined a raft of issues. In short, commercial manufacturing was not producing vaccines to the specifications expected, and regulators were unsure of the implications. EMA responded by filing two ?major objections? with Pfizer, along with a host of other questions it wanted addressed....
The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability
- Serena Tinari, journalist
Leaked documents show that some early commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech?s covid-19 vaccine had lower than expected levels of intact mRNA, prompting wider questions about how to assess this novel vaccine platform, writes Serena Tinari
As it conducted its analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine in December, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was the victim of a cyberattack.1 More than 40 megabytes of classified information from the agency?s review were published on the dark web, and several journalists?including from The BMJ?and academics worldwide were sent copies of the leaks. They came from anonymous email accounts and most efforts to interact with the senders were unsuccessful. None of the senders revealed their identity, and the EMA says it is pursuing a criminal investigation.
The BMJ has reviewed the documents, which show that regulators had major concerns over unexpectedly low quantities of intact mRNA in batches of the vaccine developed for commercial production.
EMA scientists tasked with ensuring manufacturing quality?the chemistry, manufacturing, and control aspects of Pfizer?s submission to the EMA?worried about ?truncated and modified mRNA species present in the finished product.? Among the many files leaked to The BMJ, an email dated 23 November by a high ranking EMA official outlined a raft of issues. In short, commercial manufacturing was not producing vaccines to the specifications expected, and regulators were unsure of the implications. EMA responded by filing two ?major objections? with Pfizer, along with a host of other questions it wanted addressed....