• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The effect of priming with H1N1 influenza viruses of variable antigenic distance on challenge with 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Published ahead of print 6 June 2012, doi: 10.1128/​JVI.00147-12


The effect of priming with H1N1 influenza viruses of variable antigenic distance on challenge with 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus

C.D. O'Donnell1,
A. Wright1,
L. Vogel1,
C.J. Wei2,
G.J. Nabel2 and
K. Subbarao1,#

1Laboratory of Infectious Diseases
2Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892

ABSTRACT

Compared to seasonal influenza viruses, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) virus caused greater morbidity and mortality in children and young adults. People over 60 years of age showed a higher prevalence of cross-reactive pH1N1 antibodies suggesting that they were previously exposed to an influenza virus or vaccine that was antigenically related to the pH1N1 virus. To define the basis for this cross-reactivity, ferrets were infected with H1N1 viruses of variable antigenic distance that circulated during different decades from the 1930's (Alaska/35), 1940's (Fort Monmouth/47), 1950's (Fort Warren/50), and 1990's (New Caledonia/99) and challenged with 2009 pH1N1 virus six weeks later. Ferrets primed with the homologous CA/09 or New Jersey/76 (NJ/76) virus served as a positive control, while the negative control was an influenza B virus that should not cross-protect against influenza A virus infection. Significant protection against challenge virus replication in the respiratory tract was observed in ferrets primed with AK/35, FM/47, and NJ/76; FW/50-primed ferrets showed reduced protection, and NC/99-primed ferrets were not protected. The HA's of AK/35, FM/47, and FW/50 differ in the presence of glycosylation sites. We found that the loss of protective efficacy observed with FW/50 was associated with the presence of a specific glycosylation site. Our results suggest that changes in the HA occurred between 1947 and 1950, such that prior infection could no longer protect against 2009 pH1N1 infection. This provides a mechanistic understanding of the nature of serological cross-protection observed in people over 60 years of age during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.


http://jvi.asm.org/content/early/2012/05/31/JVI.00147-12.abstract
 
Back
Top Bottom