• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The effect of air supply rate on indoor infection probability in mixing ventilation

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/art...ent2022_05004/e3sconf_roomvent2022_05004.html
The effect of air supply rate on indoor infection probability in mixing ventilation
Wei Su, Bin Yang
E3S Web Conf. 356 05004 (2022)
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202235605004

Abstract
SARS-Cov-2 has caused enormous damage to society and put human health at a hazardous level. Optimizing air distribution patterns is one of the most useful manners to minimize the infection risk of susceptible individuals. Mixing ventilation is widely used, but the effect of air supply rate on indoor infection probability has not been studied yet. Three air supply rates, including 576, 864 and 1152 m[SUP]3[/SUP]/h were adopted to study this problem in a simulated room, with dimensions of 5m×5m×2.7m. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method was used to consider indoor flow fields under three cases.
The infection probability was calculated by the revised Wells-Riley model. The results showed that the overall infection probability decreased as the air supply rate increased. Meanwhile, the infectious air exhaled by the infector would flow along with the supply airflow in a certain direction, resulting in a nonuniform distribution of infection probability in the room. Increasing air supply rate and optimizing workstation layout may be two useful manners to reduce infection probability in mixing ventilation rooms.



© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2022

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 
Back
Top Bottom