• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The decision to receive influenza vaccination among nurses in North and South Dakota

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Public Health Nurs. 2012 Mar;29(2):116-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00966.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
The decision to receive influenza vaccination among nurses in north and South dakota.
Johansen LJ, Stenvig T, Wey H.
Source

M.S., R.N., is Instructor, College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota.
Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: We examined the relationships between factors (intention, habit, facilitating conditions, and social, cognitive, and affective factors) and nurses' decisions about influenza vaccinations to understand why some get vaccinated while others do not. Design and Sample: In a descriptive correlational design, the Triandis model of interpersonal behavior was used to examine the decision of nurses to receive influenza vaccinations. Participants were a random sample (N=193) of registered nurses in North and South Dakota drawn from the respective state nursing licensing board lists. Measures: Instrument construction and mail survey procedures followed Dillman's tailored design method. Results: The response rate exceeded 80%. The findings revealed significant, positive correlations among all model variables. Item analysis showed that false beliefs about influenza disease and vaccinations were prevalent and that there was a wide variation in employer support for nurses getting vaccinated. Conclusions: Educational and social marketing strategies may improve nurse's knowledge about influenza disease and vaccine and increase vaccine uptake. Employers should be encouraged to promote and improve influenza vaccine accessibility in the workplace. Additional study is needed to understand how best to strengthen the influence of intention and habit on the decision of nurses to receive influenza vaccinations.

? 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PMID:
22372448
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22372448
 
Back
Top Bottom