• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The Clinical Usefulness of the SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test? for Detecting the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jul 1;52(4):683-5. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.4.683.
The Clinical Usefulness of the SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test? for Detecting the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus.
Choi WS, Noh JY, Huh JY, Kee SY, Jeong HW, Lee J, Song JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ.
Source

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Korea. wjkim@korea.ac.kr.
Abstract

Though the 2009 worldwide influenza A (H1N1) pandemic has been declared to have ended, the influenza virus is expected to continue to circulate from some years as a seasonal influenza. A rapid antigen test (RAT) can aid in rapid diagnosis and allow for early antiviral treatment. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of RAT using SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test? kit to detect the influenza virus, considering various factors. From August 1, 2009 to October 10, 2009, a total of 938 patients who visited the outpatient clinic at Korea University Guro Hospital with influenza-like illnesses were enrolled in the study. Throat or nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from each of the patients. Using these specimens, we evaluated the influenza detection rate by rapid antigen test based on the real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) method. In comparison with rRT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RAT were 44.0% and 99.9%, respectively. The cyclic threshold values of RAT negative specimens were higher than RAT positive specimens (30.1?3.1 vs. 28.3?3.9, p=0.031). The sensitivity of the RAT kit was higher in patients who visited clinics within two days of symptom onset (60.4% vs. 11.1%, p=0.026). The results of this study show that the RAT cannot be recommended for general use in all patients with influenza-like illness because of its low sensitivity. The RAT may be used, only in the settings with limited diagnostic resources, for patients who visit a clinic within two days of symptom onse.

PMID:
21623614
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623614
 
Back
Top Bottom