• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2017 Jul 28. pii: S0264-410X(17)30969-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations.[/h] Karafillakis E[SUP]1[/SUP], Larson HJ[SUP]2[/SUP]; ADVANCE consortium.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] The success of vaccination strategies depends in part on population perceptions of benefits and risks of vaccines and related confidence in vaccination. Better knowledge of public concerns about vaccines and what is driving them is needed to inform vaccination strategies and communications. This literature reviewer examined studies on vaccine and vaccination risk perceptions and concerns across European populations.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between 2004 and 2014 in Europe. A descriptive analysis was performed.
[h=4]FINDINGS:[/h] A total of 145 articles were selected, most of which were conducted in the UK, the Netherlands and France and studied seasonal influenza, HPV and pandemic influenza vaccination. Across all countries and vaccines, the primary area of concern was vaccine safety, followed by perceptions of low likelihood of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), perceived low severity of VPDs, beliefs that vaccines do not work, and overall lack of information. Concerns were found to be vaccine-, country- and population-specific.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] In addition to identifying concerns about vaccination in Europe, this study confirmed the notion that individuals have many safety concerns about vaccination and often believe that the risks of vaccination outweigh their benefits. More research needs to be conducted to explore the impact of different types of communication strategies, which would frame the benefits of vaccination as well as risks of not vaccinating. Strategies to better inform public perceptions of vaccines should include the provision of unbiased, comprehensive information tailored to population information needs, and delivered using multiple and new communication technologies such as social media.
Copyright ? 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Confidence; Hesitancy; Immunisation; Risk perception; Risk-benefit; Vaccine

PMID: 28760616 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061
 
Back
Top Bottom