• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Text Message Reminders for Second Dose of Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec 29. pii: peds.2014-2475. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Text Message Reminders for Second Dose of Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.[/h] Stockwell MS[SUP]1[/SUP], Hofstetter AM[SUP]2[/SUP], DuRivage N[SUP]3[/SUP], Barrett A[SUP]3[/SUP], Fernandez N[SUP]3[/SUP], Vargas CY[SUP]3[/SUP], Camargo S[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To determine whether provision of vaccine-health-literacy-promoting information in text message vaccine reminders improves receipt and timeliness of the second dose of influenza vaccine within a season for children in need of 2 doses.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] During the 2012-2013 season, families of eligible 6-month through 8-year-old children were recruited at the time of their first influenza vaccination from 3 community clinics in New York City. Children (n = 660) were randomly assigned to "educational" text message, "conventional" text message, and "written reminder-only" arms. At enrollment, all arms received a written reminder with next dose due date. Conventional messages included second dose due date and clinic walk-in hours. Educational messages added information regarding the need for a timely second dose. Receipt of second dose by April 30 was assessed by using χ[SUP]2[/SUP] tests. Timeliness was assessed by receipt of second dose by 2 weeks after due date (day 42) using χ[SUP]2[/SUP] and over time using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Most families were Latino and publicly insured with no significant between-arm differences between groups. Children in the educational arm were more likely to receive a second dose by April 30 (72.7%) versus conventional (66.7%) versus written reminder-only arm (57.1%; P = .003). They also had more timely receipt by day 42 (P < .001) and over time (P < .001).
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] In this low-income, urban, minority population, embedding health literacy information improved the effectiveness of text message reminders in promoting timely delivery of a second dose of influenza vaccine, compared with conventional text messages and written reminder only.
Copyright ? 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] immunizations; influenza; mobile health; reminder-recall; text message

PMID: 25548329 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548329
 
Back
Top Bottom