• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sydney study about wearing masks

gsgs

Registered User
mask-study from EID
280 adults from 143 families in Sydney 2006/7
Britain plans to buy 350M surgical masks

"We estimate that the reduction in risk of catching a respiratory infection for an adult caring for a sick child, when they adhere to mask use, is between 60 and 80 per cent. Whether the risk would be reduced by the same margin in another setting or where there was more than one source of potential infection requires further investigation."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article5587115.ece
http://www.inthenews.co.uk/news/autocodes/countries/australia/face-masks-can-protect-against-flu-$1263649.htm

I couldn't easily find it at EID


what were the results ? What sort of masks ?

why do they say that ritain plans to buy 350M surgical masks ?
Do they recomment surgical masks now ?
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

In 5 years I had saw a bunch of papers/studies about these masks and now we still must "wait some studies" ...

I don't need to wait on any new study about.
The diameter of the viral/microbial particles were well known, and the holes in the mask/respirator air enter also.

It's plain math to compare those two parameters and pick onto the ER/GP/hospital/care/... decision papers what kind of masks must be administered to the daily ER/hospital/... work, and what kind to be mandatory weared in an case of an novel infective agent/pandemic.

The fact is some countries make enaugh stocks, some not.

So, what would remain to the population - the ordinary surgical non-enaugh-filtering masks for "cosmetic" populistic blabling purposes, because when something already happens it can't be buyed any private/... stock.

We need more money/stocks/distribution/mandatory wearing in the main/local sites in case of something, not studies ...
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090126082530.htm

Mask-wearing Significantly Boosts Flu Protection

ScienceDaily (Jan. 26, 2009) ? Donning a face mask is an easy way to boost protection from severe respiratory illnesses such as influenza and SARS, new research from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) has found, but convincing a reluctant public and health workers is proving a struggle.

In a world-first clinical trial of the efficacy of masks, researchers found adult mask wearers* in the home were four times more likely than non-wearers to be protected against respiratory viruses, including the common cold.

The findings ? published recently in Emerging Infectious Diseases, the journal of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention ? have global implications and are particularly relevant to efforts to combat the spread of flu pandemics and other emerging respiratory diseases such as SARS.

"In the event of a severe pandemic, demand for protection could become a law and order issue," said lead author of the paper, Raina MacIntyre, who is Professor of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology and head of UNSW's School of Public Health and Community Medicine.

"In a crisis, vaccine development is likely to be delayed and drugs may be in short supply or not available at all," she said. "Limited supplies will be directed first to front line health workers, so masks are an important means of protection for the community, who otherwise may be last in line for vaccines and drugs."

While some governments are already stockpiling masks for use in emergencies, Professor MacIntyre said these guidelines had been implemented without evidence to support them.

"We now have provided that evidence. Masks play an important role in reducing transmission if they are worn properly."

At a day-to-day level, the study is also good news for parents of toddlers and young children.

"There is no effective treatment for the 90 or so common cold viruses that make families sick each winter, but masks could provide simple and effective protection," Professor MacIntyre said.

Commissioned and funded by the Australian Department of Health and Ageing in response to an urgent policy need, the study is the first randomised controlled clinical trial of masks to be conducted internationally. Researchers at UNSW, Sydney's Westmead Hospital, Imperial College (London) and the National Centre for Immunisation Research studied more than 280 adults in 143 families in Sydney during the winter seasons of 2006 and 2007. The adults were randomly allocated masks when exposed to a sick child in the household.

Professor MacIntyre said a drawback was participants' low compliance, with less than half reporting having worn the masks often or always. However, adherence to preventative measures is known to vary depending on perception of risk and would be expected to increase during a pandemic.

The next pressing research question is the value of the use of masks among health care workers. Preliminary work in Australia in 2007 showed very low acceptance of and compliance with mask use by hospital doctors and nurses.

Professor MacIntyre and her team, along with the Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are now running a large trial of masks in close to 2,000 health care workers in more than 20 hospitals in China, where compliance with masks is much greater.

"Results from this trial could have wide implications for not only pandemic influenza, but a range of communicable diseases spread within hospitals,' Professor MacIntyre said.

*both surgical and non-fit-tested P2 masks.
Adapted from materials provided by University of New South Wales, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

good news.
even surgical masks seem to be good.

Now design them so they are more comfortable.
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

That's the main problem (plus money/stocks):

#4:
"Preliminary work in Australia in 2007 showed very low acceptance of and compliance with mask use by hospital doctors and nurses."


The Chineses obviously learn a lesson with SARS:

"Professor MacIntyre and her team, along with the Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are now running a large trial of masks in close to 2,000 health care workers in more than 20 hospitals in China, where compliance with masks is much greater."

And professionals, stick to in practice to the antispreading guideliness.
Thrown out the more confortable working way, and restrict access to the wards/amb. to visitors/caughers, releaf the hospital patients from hospital aquired infections.

"Results from this trial could have wide implications for not only pandemic influenza, but a range of communicable diseases spread within hospitals,' Professor MacIntyre said."


P.S.
#1:
"Britain plans to buy 350M surgical masks"

Even if it would be a real stock, not only a "plan", that is meaning:

a surgical mask (a part the NON-air-thighteness of it) must be thrown after it was exposed to infected air before going to clean rooms, so have min. 4 of it during an warking day is a must, than:
4 daily x 30 days x 3 months of duty/seasonal flu period = 360 surgical mask (worker/cary person/people) - to round it, make it 350

350M / 350 = the quantity needed only for 1 Milion of citizens/workers

The above quantity of NON-thighten masks could be enaugh only for the med workers ...
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

they are very cheap, could also be reused after some weeks
or after disinfection.
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

they are very cheap, could also be reused after some weeks
or after disinfection.

if "they" ~= ordinary surgical masks (the green "thin phelphed" ones),

than, no hard feelings gsgs, but what kind of desinfection?

the Y rays ... :rolleyes:
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

Face Masks and Respiratory Virus Transmission | CDC EID

Face Mask Use and Control of Respiratory Virus Transmission in Households

C. Raina MacIntyre, Simon Cauchemez, Dominic E. Dwyer, Holly Seale, Pamela Cheung, Gary Browne, Michael Fasher, James Wood, Zhanhai Gao, Robert Booy, and Neil Ferguson

Author affiliations: University of New South Wales School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (C.R. MacIntyre, H. Seale, J. Wood, Z. Gao); Children's Hospital at Westmead, The University of Sydney, Sydney (C.R. MacIntyre, P. Cheung, R. Booy, G. Browne); Imperial College London, London, UK (S. Cauchemez, N. Ferguson); Westmead Hospital, Sydney (D.E. Dwyer); and The Wentworth Division of General Practice, Sydney (M. Fasher)

Abstract

Many countries are stockpiling face masks for use as a nonpharmaceutical intervention to control virus transmission during an influenza pandemic. We conducted a prospective cluster-randomized trial comparing surgical masks, non?fit-tested P2 masks, and no masks in prevention of influenza-like illness (ILI) in households.
Mask use adherence was self-reported.
During the 2006 and 2007 winter seasons, 286 exposed adults from 143 households who had been exposed to a child with clinical respiratory illness were recruited. We found that adherence to mask use significantly reduced the risk for ILI-associated infection, but <50% of participants wore masks most of the time.
We concluded that household use of face masks is associated with low adherence and is ineffective for controlling seasonal respiratory disease.
However, during a severe pandemic when use of face masks might be greater, pandemic transmission in households could be reduced.
-
<cite cite="http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/15/2/233.htm">Face Masks and Respiratory Virus Transmission | CDC EID</cite>
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

Face Masks Protect Against Flu and Common Cold, Study Shows

By Nicolas Johnson

<!-- WARNING: #foreach: $wnstory.ATTS: null at /bb/data/web/templates/webmacro_en/washingtonstory.wm:280.19 --> Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Parents wearing face masks at home are four times less likely to catch their children’s seasonal cold or flu, a new study shows, providing the first clinical evidence that masks could help in the event of a flu pandemic.

The research followed 286 adults in Sydney during the winters of 2006 and 2007. Another study of 2,000 health workers in Chinese hospitals shows similar results, said researcher Raina MacIntyre of the University of New South Wales.

The world is closer to another influenza pandemic than at any time since 1968, when the last of the previous century’s three pandemics occurred, according to the World Health Organization.

“Our study is important because it’s provided the first positive evidence,” MacIntyre said in a telephone interview. “Whatever drugs and vaccines we have available will be reserved for mainly health-care workers, so for people in the community it’s something that’s relatively cheap, and we know it’s effective, if it’s worn.”

The study was published in this week’s Emerging Infectious Diseases journal of the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors found many adults didn’t comply, and were reluctant to wear surgical masks, probably because the perceived risk of catching a cold wasn’t very high, the researchers said. In the event of a life-threatening disease, compliance would probably be much higher, they said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Nicolas Johnson in Tokyo at nicojohnson@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: January 26, 2009 08:00 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=a6UcweV.39JI
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

study now available at EID:
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/15/2/233.htm


my summary:

during winter seasons 2006 and 2007 in Sydney 3 groups were formed:
(surgical,P2(N95),no mask) of (180,172,192) children ,(94,92,100) adults
in (47,46,52) households with one sick child with ILI

Samples were taken from 141 sick children; viruses were found in 90 :
flu-A in 19, flu-B in 7

wearing masks reduced (p=0.015) the adult household infection risk
by (~70%,~70%,0%)

no difference between P2 and surgical

ILI was observed in (21,14,16) adults = 18%

Samples were taken from 43 of the 51 sick adults, virus found in 17/43 (6,8,3)
In (3,5,2) cases it was the same virus as the index-child
In (1,1,0) cases, ni virus was found in the index child
In (2,2,1) cases , they had different viruses

---------------------------------------

I don't yet understand this.
They succeeded to fog the results.

There was _more_ ILI in the mask groups, yet they mysteriously
conclude an infection reduction of 60-80% for mask users
without showing numbers.
And despite these 60-80% they say another study (12) _also_
found no difference in the intervention "arms".
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

Maybe UV lights?

Sorry mixin, but my opinion diverge.

How many UV lighters we must buy or install to make this.
Do we stay at a queue to wait such doubtfull decontamination.
___

With all respect to all the players,
ordinary surgical masks are constructed for an "use and threw" tecnic.

The P2 aren't 100% tight, that's why can failure.

P3 also are to be threwed after the usage.

Do you reuse your infected latex gloves?

No, you must have eventualy some special ones, which construction is builted to be decontaminated (as massive gloves rubber/glass... masks).

It can't be any fogging for reusing odinary "use it once" equipment because of high money investments in real quantities, or qualities of the biosecurity stocks.

The folks like to wearing nothing, the producers don't want to make vacc. in advance to be threwed after, "you are on your own", "social distancing" would be the key because will be no vacc./meds ...

Gi'me a break.

Or we must realy try to be prepared for an problem, or it is better back off on suggesting preparations.
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

I have my own UV lights (55W each) as part of my water sanitation.

The problem with UV disinfecting materials is that the penetration of UVC in most materials is not very good. The UVC doesn't reach into the cloth where it is needed. It does go through water and quartz glass but not ordinary glass (for instance).

What would be the problem with chlorine bleach on the mask?
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

bleach or heat it or just wait

I know, they use UVC in front of filters to disinfect the Hepa filters
in institutes

but for masses of masks probably just heating or bleach is easiest,
if supply is sparce
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

#16: "... if supply is sparce"

Ok, I can understand such policy in the midst of an unprepared infectious pandemic, but what is not enaugh good is including such grassroot dispositions as the main health care shielding policy, instead of stocking more, or change masks in decontaminable ones.

Especialy because such surgical masks shields only the droplets because the holes are big, and nor the air input which is not sealed.

It is enaugh one health care/med worker to be infected at the same time when he think it is protected by such a mask, to infect the whole team/ward.

At the end we would put on the nose an scrape of cloth and than boiled it ... can we got something better in the 21 century?

In an pandemic hospital/ER/care environment, why it is so scarry put on face at least an plastic/rubber respirator/mask with an changeable special paper filter?

In that case the mask would be reused continuously, the cost is to produce enaugh "put once" filters.
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

(12) is here:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=18461182

they had a secondary attack rate of only 6% and found no evidence
that hand-hygiene or masks did help

I see.

But that's an xxx household study (3 persons), and it is not applicable for modelling the shielding of med personnel at ER/hospital/care structure.

The masks didn't help obviously because simple surgery masks are non adequate for air filtering and have no sealing, all mist with an non rigid woring practice and masks reusage instead of threwing them after exposition.

The main reason why is this pressure on such evaluations is obviously only because of:

"Study: "Only non-pharmaceutical interventions [7][12] including use of (MY ADD.: SIMPLE) face masks, improved hand hygiene, cough etiquette, social distancing measures, and travel restrictions would be available to the majority of the world's population."
 
Re: Sydney study about wearing masks

I have some questions:

Is it confirmed that surgical masks must be changed every time you come back home?

If you do not have the luxury of having 100 masks for yourself, is there any way to re-use them? Would bleach be a good idea? The masks are made of thin fabric... wouldn't getting them wet damage them?
Also, I read that influenza virus can typically only live 24 hours outside of the body, couldn't you simply put them aside (heat them in the microwave? or maybe leave them in the fridge?) and wait 1 day?

Is it true, as tropical said, that the masks filter will only protect you from droplets from people sneezing, and not the smaller air-borne viruses from people coughing?

And that brings me to my final question: how easily does it spread? Would a person have to cough or sneeze on you... or can the virus simply be floating in the air on an empty street, and you walk by and inhale it?
 
Back
Top