• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Survey of influenza vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among pregnant women in the 2016-17 season

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 25. pii: S0264-410X(20)30054-2. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.039. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Survey of influenza vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among pregnant women in the 2016-17 season.[/h]
King JP[SUP]1[/SUP], Hanson KE[SUP]2[/SUP], Donahue JG[SUP]3[/SUP], Glanz JM[SUP]4[/SUP], Klein NP[SUP]5[/SUP], Naleway AL[SUP]6[/SUP], DeStefano F[SUP]7[/SUP], Weintraub E[SUP]8[/SUP], Belongia EA[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States is suboptimal. We surveyed women who were pregnant during the 2016-17 influenza season to assess knowledge and attitudes regarding influenza vaccination.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We identified and sampled pregnant women to include approximately equal numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated women from strata defined by vaccination status and trimester from four integrated health systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). Potential participants were contacted via mail and telephone to complete a standardized survey. Characteristics and responses of women vaccinated and unvaccinated during pregnancy were compared.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The survey was completed by 510 (48%) of 1062 contacted women; 500 were included in the analysis. Vaccine receipt while pregnant was associated with primigravida status (p = 0.02), college degree (p = 0.01), employment in health care (p < 0.01), and history of routine annual influenza vaccination (p < 0.01). Among 330 vaccinated women, the primary reasons for vaccination included protection of self and baby from influenza (n = 233, 71%), and medical professional recommendation (n = 46, 14%). Multiple reasons were given for nonvaccination, but concern about 'negative effects' was cited most often (n = 44, 29%). Vaccinated women were significantly more likely to believe that influenza vaccines are safe and effective, and to recognize the potential for harm from influenza infection. Nearly all women reported receiving at least one influenza vaccination recommendation from a healthcare provider.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Vaccinated pregnant women were more likely to receive routine annual influenza vaccine compared to those not vaccinated. Recommendations by obstetric providers should be supplemented with efforts to encourage women of childbearing age to receive annual vaccination.
Copyright ? 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; Knowledge; Pregnancy; Vaccination

PMID: 31992481 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.039
 
Back
Top Bottom