• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Study - Small Network of Companies Control 60% of the Global Revenue

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
Study says a small network of companies control 60% of the global revenue:

The network of global corporate control
Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder, and Stefano Battiston
Chair of Systems Design, ETH Zurich, Kreuzplatz 5, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland,
email: sbattiston@ethz.ch

"The work, to be published in PLoS One, revealed a core of 1318 companies with interlocking ownerships (see image). Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20. What's more, although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 appeared to collectively own through their shares the majority of the world's large blue chip and manufacturing firms - the "real" economy - representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues.

When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147 even more tightly knit companies - all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity - that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network.

"In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network," says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.

http://www.newscientist.com/article...e-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html

From the paper:


:Cross-shareholdings, or strongly connected components (SCCs) in graph theory, are sub-network structures where companies own each other directly or indirectly through a chain of links (seeFig. S7). Graphically speaking, this means that they form cycles and are all reachable by every other firm in the SCC."

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf
 

Attachments

Re: Study - Small Network of Companies Control 60% of the Global Revenue

A most fascinating study that clearly sets out what I have long suspected.

In the interests of democracy, I would advocate that everyone who can afford it buys just 10 shares (or one if that is possible) in as many of these companies as possible. This will entitle them to a shareholders vote, which may help to protect against the evolution of a corporate dicatatorship.
 
Re: Study - Small Network of Companies Control 60% of the Global Revenue

This story here about News Corp and the Murdochs illustrates my intended point quite nicely
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15440825. Not quite enough votes to sack them, but with a more diverse shares ownership, it could easily have been a different outcome.
 
Back
Top Bottom