• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Study says 1918 flu resulted in current lineage of H1N1 swine influenza viruses

mixin

Well-known member
Their research supports the hypothesis that the 1918 pandemic influenza virus and the virus causing the swine flu were the same. Richt said the virus was able to infect and replicate in swine and cause mild respiratory disease. The 1918 virus spread through the pig population, adapted to the swine and resulted in the current lineage of the H1N1 swine influenza viruses. The researchers' study is published in the May 2009 Journal of Virology.

"It also suggests that pigs could have played a role in maintaining and spreading the 1918 human pandemic influenza virus."

While swine flu was first recognized as a disease in 1918, there also were reports of the influenza occurring in the Midwest in 1930.

For the study, the researchers used the 1918 pandemic virus and a 1930 H1N1 influenza virus for experimental infections in swine. The 1930 virus was chosen as a virus because it is thought to be a descendent of the 1918 virus, Richt said.

The researchers did not find a significant difference in effects from the 1918 and 1930 viruses in infected pigs. This was surprising, since the 1918 virus killed more than 20 million people and was lethal to ferrets, mice and macaques. Another surprising finding from the study was the rapid antibody response in the animals infected with the 1918 virus, which is not typically reported for the swine influenza virus.

Richt said he plans to conduct a follow-up project that will study what makes a swine flu virus a pandemic flu virus.

http://www.physorg.com/news160309140.html
 
Re: Study says 1918 flu resulted in current lineage of H1N1 swine influenza viruses

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668479/
followup in 2011:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209293/

pH1N1 more virulent (in pigs than IA30) due in part to differences in the
host transcriptional response during acute infection

I think it is now believed that IA30 did not descend from the 1918 virus
but that in most segments the common ancester is from ~1912

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/07/10/0904991106.full.pdf
Smith et.al. July 2009

av,1881,1906,1904,1885*,1884*,1907,1884,1899
sw,1903,1914,1914,1916,1909,1913,1896*,1908
hu,1910,1918,1918,1913,1918,1918,1911,1915
 
Back
Top