• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Study: no increased risk of infection in airplanes

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jDrbwDY4WzgHXP9aJD_XeMpdpeuQ

Fear of flying infections exaggerated, study finds

4 hours ago

SYDNEY (AFP) ? The widely-held belief that passengers crowded aboard airliners are exposed to a high risk of catching infectious diseases is exaggerated, an Australian government study has found.

The belief that the air in planes is full of contaminants is based on the perception that it is continually recycled with limited input from outside, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau said in a report released Tuesday.

But if recirculation and filtration systems are working properly, the risk from flying -- as far as bugs are concerned at least -- should be no worse than travelling by bus or eating in a restaurant, the study suggests.

"The risk of transmission of infection on board an aircraft is probably no greater than, and perhaps less than, other environments where large numbers of people are gathered together," it says.


The bureau noted that the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002 and recent outbreaks of bird flu in Asia had increased concerns about the risks of air travel.

Infectious diseases reported to have been transmitted on board an aircraft include influenza, tuberculosis and SARS, it said.

But considering the number of flights each day, such cases occurred relatively infrequently.

There was also evidence that most of the victims had been infected by sitting close to a sick passenger and being exposed to droplets from sneezing or coughing rather than from contaminated recirculated air, the study found.

Outside air entering an aircraft cabin at altitude is essentially sterile and the airflow pattern and frequent air exchanges minimise the spread of infections, the report said.

In modern aircraft the airflow is from the top of the cabin down to the floor, where it is vented and either exhausted or re-circulated.

"The ventilation system is usually designed so that air entering the cabin at a given seat row is exhausted at the same seat row.

"This limits the amount of air flowing towards the front and back of the aircraft," the bureau said.
 
Re: Fear of flying infections exaggerated, study finds

Re: Fear of flying infections exaggerated, study finds

better headline IMO:
no increased risk of infection in airplanes


still airplanes can transport the germs over large distances
thus helping them to spread
 
Re: Fear of flying infections exaggerated, study finds

Re: Fear of flying infections exaggerated, study finds

"But if recirculation and filtration systems are working properly, the risk from flying -- as far as bugs are concerned at least -- should be no worse than travelling by bus or eating in a restaurant, the study suggests.""

The study not put things in the correct context:

It's a matter of international flyings, or wide national, and tryings for escaping the insertion of the new pathogen in the country by breathing with a passenger without simptoms coming few hours ago from an infected niche.

After the spreader is lifted free on the ground, the illness would be spreaded by breathings similar (as the study stated) in the restaurants, buses, undergrounds, etc.
 
Back
Top