• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc . Accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests via infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc


. 2024 Oct 28:327:125337.
doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.125337. Online ahead of print. Accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests via infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alexandre de Fátima Cobre[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mariana Millan Fachi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Karime Zeraik Abdalla Domingues[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Raul Edison Luna Lazo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luana Mota Ferreira[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fernanda Stumpf Tonin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Roberto Pontarolo[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

This study aims to synthesize the evidence on the accuracy parameters of COVID-19 diagnosis methods using infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). A systematic review with searches in PubMed and Embase was performed (September 2023). Studies reporting data on test specificity, sensitivity, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative using different human samples were included. Meta-analysis of accuracy estimates with 95 % confidence intervals and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were conducted (Meta-Disc 1.4.7). Seventeen studies were included - all of them highlighted regions 650-1800 cm[SUP]-1[/SUP] and 2300-3900 cm[SUP]-1[/SUP] as most important for diagnosing COVID-19. The FTIR technique presented high sensitivity [0.912 (95 %CI, 0.878-0.939), especially in vaccinated [0.959 (CI95 %, 0.908-0.987)] compared to unvaccinated [0.625 (CI95 %, 0.584-0.664)] individuals for COVID-19. Overall specificity was also high [0.886 (95 %CI, 0.855-0.912), with increased rates in vaccinated [0.884 (CI95 %, 0.819-0.932)] than in unvaccinated [0.667 (CI95 %, 0.629-0.704)] patients. These findings reveal that FTIR is an accurate technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in different biological matrices with advantages including low cost, rapid and environmentally friendly with minimal preparation analyses. This could lead to an easy implementation of this technique in practice as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19, especially in low-income countries.

Keywords: Coronavirus; Evidence; FTIR; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity; Specificity.

 
Back
Top Bottom