• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Seroprevalence of three influenza A viruses (H1N1, H3N2, and H3N8) in pet dogs presented to veterinary hospital in Ohio

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Vet Sci. 2016 Aug 10. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Seroprevalence of three influenza A viruses (H1N1, H3N2, and H3N8) in pet dogs presented to veterinary hospital in Ohio.[/h] Jang H[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Jackson YK[SUP]3[/SUP], Daniels JB[SUP]4[/SUP], Ali A[SUP]1[/SUP], Kang KI[SUP]1[/SUP], Elaish M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Lee CW[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The prevalence of canine H3N8 influenza, and human H1N1 and H3N2 influenza in dogs in Ohio was estimated by conducting serologic tests on 1,082 canine serum samples; risk factors, such as health status and age were examined. The prevalence of human H1N1, H3N2, and canine H3N8 were 4.0%, 2.4% and 2.3%, respectively, and two samples were seropositive to two subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2; H1N1 and canine influenza virus (CIV) H3N8). Dogs with respiratory signs were 5.795 times more likely to be seropositive against human H1N1 virus than healthy dogs (p-value=0.042). The prevalence of human flu infection increased in accordance with the increase in age and varied by the serum collection month. A commercial ELISA used in this study could not detect nucleoprotein specific antibodies from many HI positive sera, which indicates the need for the development and validation of rapid tests for influenza screening in canine population. In summary, we confirmed low exposure of dogs to CIV and human influenza viruses in Ohio. We identified potential risk factors involved for consideration in future investigations. Our findings also support the need for establishment of reliable diagnostic standards for serologic detection of influenza infection in canine species.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Canine influenza; Cross-sectional study; Prevalence; Risk factors; Serology

PMID: 27515265
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom