Sequencing error question

[gsgs]

looks like sequencing errors near the start
we saw that before

4655,4665 should be from S1 whose sequences are mysteriously distant
from all other ones

-----------------------------------
I think it's quite obvious in this case and more than "sequencing error speculations" (I didn't choose that subject line)

 

[mixin]

Re: Sequencing error speculations

Re: Sequencing error speculations

I know in the past, on a number of occasions, that your "speculation" has been right and confirmed by the lab.

This sequence has been commented on in several papers. Maybe it should be reviewed by the Chinese, too.