• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Science: Immune boosting by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) depends on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
Immune boosting by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) depends on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure

CATHERINE J. REYNOLDS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-653XCORINNA PADE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-2346JOSEPH M. GIBBONS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-2381ASHLEY D. OTTER https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-9194KAI-MIN LIN https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-1530DIANA MUÑOZ SANDOVAL https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-3989FRANZISKA P. PIEPER https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-0518DAVID K. BUTLER https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-8159SIYI LIU https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-9661[...]ROSEMARY J. BOYTON https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-0797 +12 authors Authors Info & Affiliations

SCIENCE
14 Jun 2022
First Release
DOI: 10.1126/science.abq1841
Abstract

The Omicron, or Pango lineage B.1.1.529, variant of SARS-CoV-2 carries multiple spike mutations with high transmissibility and partial neutralizing antibody (nAb) escape. Vaccinated individuals show protection from severe disease, often attributed to primed cellular immunity. We investigated T and B cell immunity against B.1.1.529 in triple mRNA vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW) with different SARS-CoV-2 infection histories. B and T cell immunity against previous variants of concern was enhanced in triple vaccinated individuals, but magnitude of T and B cell responses against B.1.1.529 spike protein was reduced. Immune imprinting by infection with the earlier B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant resulted in less durable binding antibody against B.1.1.529. Previously infection-naïve HCW who became infected during the B.1.1.529 wave showed enhanced immunity against earlier variants, but reduced nAb potency and T cell responses against B.1.1.529 itself. Previous Wuhan Hu-1 infection abrogated T cell recognition and any enhanced cross-reactive neutralizing immunity on infection with B.1.1.529.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841
 
I hate these abstracts-formulations. Things are being encomplicatified.

in HCWs with 3doses of mRNA vaccine (which is variant Wuhan-Hu-1) :

1.) mRNA vaccines work better against pre-omicron variants

2.) alpha infection gave less durable immunity against omicron
(than no infection at all)

3.) omicron infection alone gave better immunity against omicron
than Wuhan-HU1 plus omicron infections

---------------------------------------------
is it original antigenic sin ?

after 3 W-exposures (vaccine) , a new O-exposure increases
immunity against W but not O.

That would be bad for the new omicron-adapted vaccines
 
Back
Top Bottom