• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Total Environ Amplified Ozone Pollution in Cities During the COVID-19 Lockdown

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Total Environ


. 2020 May 20;735:139542.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. Online ahead of print.
Amplified Ozone Pollution in Cities During the COVID-19 Lockdown


Pierre Sicard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alessandra De Marco[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Evgenios Agathokleous[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Zhaozhong Feng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaobin Xu[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Elena Paoletti[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jos? Jaime Di?guez Rodriguez[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Vicent Calatayud[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The effect of lockdown due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on air pollution in four Southern European cities (Nice, Rome, Valencia and Turin) and Wuhan (China) was quantified, with a focus on ozone (O[SUB]3[/SUB]). Compared to the same period in 2017-2019, the daily O[SUB]3[/SUB] mean concentrations increased at urban stations by 24% in Nice, 14% in Rome, 27% in Turin, 2.4% in Valencia and 36% in Wuhan during the lockdown in 2020. This increase in O[SUB]3[/SUB] concentrations is mainly explained by an unprecedented reduction in NO[SUB]x[/SUB] emissions leading to a lower O[SUB]3[/SUB] titration by NO. Strong reductions in NO[SUB]2[/SUB] mean concentrations were observed in all European cities, ~53% at urban stations, comparable to Wuhan (57%), and ~65% at traffic stations. NO declined even further, ~63% at urban stations and ~78% at traffic stations in Europe. Reductions in PM[SUB]2.5[/SUB] and PM[SUB]10[/SUB] at urban stations were overall much smaller both in magnitude and relative change in Europe (~8%) than in Wuhan (~42%). The PM reductions due to limiting transportation and fuel combustion in institutional and commercial buildings were partly offset by increases of PM emissions from the activities at home in some of the cities. The NO[SUB]x[/SUB] concentrations during the lockdown were on average 49% lower than those at weekends of the previous years in all cities. The lockdown effect on O[SUB]3[/SUB] production was ~10% higher than the weekend effect in Southern Europe and 38% higher in Wuhan, while for PM the lockdown had the same effect as weekends in Southern Europe (~6% of difference). This study highlights the challenge of reducing the formation of secondary pollutants such as O[SUB]3[/SUB] even with strict measures to control primary pollutant emissions. These results are relevant for designing abatement policies of urban pollution.

Keywords: Air quality; Coronavirus; Lockdown; Ozone; Risk assessment.
 
Back
Top Bottom