• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Rep . Mixed methods study of views and experience of non-hospitalised individuals with long COVID of using pacing interventions

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep


. 2025 Apr 25;15(1):14467.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96319-6. Mixed methods study of views and experience of non-hospitalised individuals with long COVID of using pacing interventions

Christel McMullan[SUP] 1 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Shamil Haroon[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Grace Turner[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi[SUP] 8 6 9 10 11 12 [/SUP], Sarah E Hughes[SUP] 8 6 9 10 11 12 [/SUP], Sarah Flanagan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Anuradhaa Subramanian[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Krish Nirantharakumar[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Elin Haf Davies[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Chris Frost[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Louise Jackson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Naijie Guan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Yvonne Alder[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Amy Chong[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lewis Buckland[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Felicity Jeyes[SUP] 8 [/SUP], David Stanton[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Melanie Calvert[SUP] 8 6 9 10 11 12 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Long COVID is highly prevalent and debilitating, with key symptoms including fatigue, breathlessness, and brain fog. Pacing is an approach to energy conservation used to help people with chronic conditions like ME/CFS manage the impact of their condition, and could be a useful strategy for people with Long COVID. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of non-hospitalised adults with Long COVID of pacing as an intervention. This mixed methods study is part of the Therapies for Long COVID (TLC) Feasibility trial. A feasibility questionnaire was developed for participants. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of participants at the end of the study and these interviews were analysed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. 28 participants completed the feasibility questionnaire and 19 participants took part in a qualitative interview. Participants found that pacing helped improve motivation and activity planning. Concerns included challenges due to time constraints, complexity of the intervention, and limited instructions. Pacing for Long COVID may offer potential benefits and is feasible but further research is required to demonstrate its benefits. Overall, research on pacing in the context of Long COVID has the potential to enhance our understanding of symptom management and rehabilitation strategies for this emerging population.

Keywords: Long Covid; Mixed methods; Pacing; Qualitative.

 
Back
Top Bottom