tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep
. 2022 Oct 29;12(1):18230.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22643-w.
Infection control for COVID-19 in hospital examination room
Mamoru Takada[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Taichi Fukushima[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sho Ozawa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Syuma Matsubara[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Takeshi Suzuki[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ichiro Fukumoto[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Toyoyuki Hanazawa[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Takeshi Nagashima[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Reiko Uruma[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Masayuki Otsuka[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gaku Tanaka[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Healthcare providers are vulnerable to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) because of their close proximity to patients with coronavirus disease 2019. SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted via direct and indirect contact with respiratory droplets, and its airborne transmission has also been identified. However, evidence for environmental factors is scarce, and evidence-based measures to minimize the risk of infection in clinical settings are insufficient. Using computational fluid dynamics, we simulated exhalation of large and small aerosol particles by patients in an otolaryngology examination room, where medical procedures require the removal of a face mask. The effects of coughing were analyzed, as well as those of humidity as a controllable environmental factor and of a suction device as an effective control method. Our results show that a suction device can minimize aerosol exposure of healthcare workers by efficiently removing both large (11.6-98.2%) and small (39.3-99.9%) aerosol particles. However, for coughing patients, the removal efficiency varies inversely with the particle size, and the humidity notably affects the aerosol behavior, indicating the need for countermeasures against smaller aerosols. Overall, these results highlight the potential and limitation of using a suction device to protect against SARS-CoV-2 and future respiratory infections.
. 2022 Oct 29;12(1):18230.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22643-w.
Infection control for COVID-19 in hospital examination room
Mamoru Takada[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Taichi Fukushima[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sho Ozawa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Syuma Matsubara[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Takeshi Suzuki[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ichiro Fukumoto[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Toyoyuki Hanazawa[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Takeshi Nagashima[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Reiko Uruma[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Masayuki Otsuka[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gaku Tanaka[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36309548
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22643-w
Abstract
Healthcare providers are vulnerable to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) because of their close proximity to patients with coronavirus disease 2019. SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted via direct and indirect contact with respiratory droplets, and its airborne transmission has also been identified. However, evidence for environmental factors is scarce, and evidence-based measures to minimize the risk of infection in clinical settings are insufficient. Using computational fluid dynamics, we simulated exhalation of large and small aerosol particles by patients in an otolaryngology examination room, where medical procedures require the removal of a face mask. The effects of coughing were analyzed, as well as those of humidity as a controllable environmental factor and of a suction device as an effective control method. Our results show that a suction device can minimize aerosol exposure of healthcare workers by efficiently removing both large (11.6-98.2%) and small (39.3-99.9%) aerosol particles. However, for coughing patients, the removal efficiency varies inversely with the particle size, and the humidity notably affects the aerosol behavior, indicating the need for countermeasures against smaller aerosols. Overall, these results highlight the potential and limitation of using a suction device to protect against SARS-CoV-2 and future respiratory infections.