• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Rep . Comparable immune escape capacity between KP.2 and other SARS-CoV-2 variants in the central Chinese population after the first COVID-19 b

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep


. 2025 May 22;15(1):17762.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02927-7. Comparable immune escape capacity between KP.2 and other SARS-CoV-2 variants in the central Chinese population after the first COVID-19 booster

Youhua Yuan[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Junhong Xu[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Guohua Chen[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yan Liu[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 [/SUP], Libo Ouyang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bing Ma[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Baoya Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wenjuan Yan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qi Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qiong Ma[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jiangfeng Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xiaohuan Mao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiaohuan Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yiman Geng[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Huiling Wang[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Yi Li[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Peiming Zheng[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Rong Wang[SUP] 10 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The neutralisation ability of homologous and heterologous booster vaccinations against the KP.2 variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the neutralisation of the Omicron variants by comparing serum samples from Chinese individuals who received heterologous boosters (from different manufacturers) with those who received homologous boosters (from the same manufacturer) against SARS-CoV-2. We collected serum samples from participants in the homologous (n = 38) and heterologous booster groups (n = 38) over 690 days. Serum pseudo virus neutralisation was tested against the prototype, XBB.1, JN.1, and KP.2 variants to detect neutralisation titres. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the total concentration of neutralising antibodies against the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. Neutralisation assays revealed 12.3-, 12.3-, and 11.4-fold reductions against JN.1, KP.2, and XBB.1 variants, respectively, compared with that against the prototype. However, no significant difference was observed in neutralising antibody titres among the JN.1, KP.2, and XBB.1 Omicron variants. Additionally, homologous boosters and men produced fewer neutralising antibodies compared to heterologous boosters and women. Thus, our results demonstrate that the Omicron variant KP.2 exhibits similar evasion properties to those observed in other variants.

Keywords: Booster vaccine; COVID-19; Chinese population; KP.2; Omicron variant; XDV.1.

 
Back
Top Bottom