tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep
. 2023 Apr 28;13(1):6991.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34220-w. Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests need obligatory internal validation
Katarzyna Linkowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tomasz Bogiel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katarzyna Lamperska[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Andrzej Marszałek[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jarosław Starzyński[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Łukasz Szylberg[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Aleksandra Szwed-Kowalska[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Małgorzata Pawłowska[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Tomasz Grzybowski[SUP] 9 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Although infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) does not appear to be as serious a threat to public health as it was in 2020-2021, the increased transmissibility of multiple Omicron descendants may constitute a continuous challenge for health care systems, and reliable detection of new variants is still imperative. This study evaluates the performance of three SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests: Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real Time Multiplex RT-PCR Kit (Liferiver); Vitassay qPCR SARS-CoV-2 (Vitaassay) and TaqPath COVID‑19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The analytical sensitivity of the assays as well as their specificity were determined with the use of synthetic nucleic acid standards and clinical samples. All assays appeared to be 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in general and the Omicron variant in particular. The LOD determined during this validation was 10 viral RNA copies/reaction for Liferiver and TaqPath and 100 viral RNA copies for Vitassay. We cannot exclude that the LOD for the Vitassay might be lower and close to the manufacturer's declared value of ≥ 20 genome copies/reaction, as we obtained 90% positive results for 10 viral RNA copies/reaction. Mean Ct values at the concentration of 10 viral RNA copies/reaction for the Liferiver, Vitassay and TaqPath kits (35, 37 and 33, respectively) were significantly lower than the cutoff values declared by the manufacturers (≤ 41, ≤ 40 and ≤ 37, respectively). We suggest reporting outcomes based on LOD and cutoff Ct values determined during internal validation rather than those declared by the assays' producers.
. 2023 Apr 28;13(1):6991.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34220-w. Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests need obligatory internal validation
Katarzyna Linkowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tomasz Bogiel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katarzyna Lamperska[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Andrzej Marszałek[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jarosław Starzyński[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Łukasz Szylberg[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Aleksandra Szwed-Kowalska[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Małgorzata Pawłowska[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Tomasz Grzybowski[SUP] 9 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37117538
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34220-w
Although infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) does not appear to be as serious a threat to public health as it was in 2020-2021, the increased transmissibility of multiple Omicron descendants may constitute a continuous challenge for health care systems, and reliable detection of new variants is still imperative. This study evaluates the performance of three SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests: Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real Time Multiplex RT-PCR Kit (Liferiver); Vitassay qPCR SARS-CoV-2 (Vitaassay) and TaqPath COVID‑19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The analytical sensitivity of the assays as well as their specificity were determined with the use of synthetic nucleic acid standards and clinical samples. All assays appeared to be 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in general and the Omicron variant in particular. The LOD determined during this validation was 10 viral RNA copies/reaction for Liferiver and TaqPath and 100 viral RNA copies for Vitassay. We cannot exclude that the LOD for the Vitassay might be lower and close to the manufacturer's declared value of ≥ 20 genome copies/reaction, as we obtained 90% positive results for 10 viral RNA copies/reaction. Mean Ct values at the concentration of 10 viral RNA copies/reaction for the Liferiver, Vitassay and TaqPath kits (35, 37 and 33, respectively) were significantly lower than the cutoff values declared by the manufacturers (≤ 41, ≤ 40 and ≤ 37, respectively). We suggest reporting outcomes based on LOD and cutoff Ct values determined during internal validation rather than those declared by the assays' producers.