• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Rep . A comparison of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 sequencing methods from nasopharyngeal samples

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep


. 2022 Jul 22;12(1):12561.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16549-w.
A comparison of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 sequencing methods from nasopharyngeal samples


Zuzana Gerber[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christian Daviaud[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Damien Delafoy[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Florian Sandron[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonathan Mercier[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sylvain Gerber[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Vincent Meyer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anne Boland[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Laurence Bocket[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Robert Olaso[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Jean-François Deleuze[SUP] 7 8 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to threaten public health and burden healthcare systems worldwide. Whole SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing has become essential for epidemiological monitoring and identification of new variants, which could represent a risk of increased transmissibility, virulence, or resistance to vaccines or treatment. Different next-generation sequencing approaches are used in SARS-CoV-2 sequencing, although with different ability to provide whole genome coverage without gaps and to reliably detect new variants. In this study, we compared the performance of three target enrichment methods (two multiplex amplification methods and one hybridization capture) using nasopharyngeal swabs from infected individuals. We applied these target enrichment methods to the same set of nasopharyngeal samples (N = 93) in high-throughput mode. SARS-CoV-2 genome was obtained using short-read next-generation sequencing. We observed that each method has some advantages, such as high mapping rate (CleanPlex and COVIDSeq) or absence of systematic variant calling error (SureSelect) as well as their limitations such as suboptimal uniformity of coverage (CleanPlex), high cost (SureSelect) or supply shortages (COVIDSeq). Nevertheless, each of the three target enrichment kits tested in this study yielded acceptable results of whole SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing and either of them can therefore be used in prospective programs of genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2. Genomic surveillance will be crucial to overcoming the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, despite its successive waves and continually emerging variants.
 
Back
Top Bottom