• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Prog . Which type of vaccine is more beneficial for reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, CoronaVac, BNT162b2, or TURKOVAC?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Prog


. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251366362.
doi: 10.1177/00368504251366362. Epub 2025 Aug 10. Which type of vaccine is more beneficial for reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, CoronaVac, BNT162b2, or TURKOVAC?

Süleyman Yazıcı[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Osman Fehmi Beyazal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hasan Tezcan[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between TURKOVAC, CoronaVac, and BNT162b2 and deep vein thrombosis.MethodsBetween 2022 and 2024, a case-control study was planned with 400 patients included (deep vein thrombosis group (n = 200) and control group (n = 200). Patients were divided into four groups according to their vaccine types. Group 1 (n = 54): those who received only CoronaVac, Group 2 (n = 233): those who received only BNT162b2, Group 3 (n = 49): those who received CoronaVac for the first dose, and then BNT162b2, Group 4 (n = 15): those who received BNT162b2 for the first dose and then TURKOVAC. First, the deep vein thrombosis and control groups were compared regarding basic characteristics. Then, patients in the four groups were compared in terms of deep vein thrombosis.ResultsNo difference was found in the frequency of COVID-19 disease in the deep vein thrombosis and control groups. The frequency of vaccination was lower in the deep vein thrombosis group (84%-91.5%). According to the multivariate regression test result, we found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.003, OR = 0.377 [95% CI, 0.197-0.722]). After being divided into four groups, the rates of deep vein thrombosis were 36 (66.7%), 96 (41.2%), 29 (59.2%), and 7 (46.7%), respectively. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis was significantly lower in Group 2 (p = 0.003). Although no statistically significant difference was found among other groups, the lowest deep vein thrombosis frequency was found in Group 4, Group 3, and Group 1, respectively.ConclusionThe frequency of COVID-19 vaccination was lower in patients with deep vein thrombosis than in those without. Deep vein thrombosis was least common in patients who received only BNT162b2. Although the frequency of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the groups, we found that the lowest rate of deep vein thrombosis was in the group that received TURKOVAC after BNT162b2.

Keywords: BNT162b2; COVID-19; CoronaVac; TURKOVAC; deep vein thrombosis.

 
Back
Top Bottom