• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Adv . Comparison of replicating and nonreplicating vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Adv


. 2022 Aug 26;8(34):eabm8563.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm8563. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Comparison of replicating and nonreplicating vaccines against SARS-CoV-2


Haley E Mudrick[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shane Massey[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Erin B McGlinch[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Brian J Parrett[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Jack R Hemsath[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Mary E Barry[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jeffrey D Rubin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Chisom Uzendu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michael J Hansen[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Courtney L Erskine[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Virginia P Van Keulen[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Aleksandra Drelich[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Joseph A Panos[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Madiha Fida[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gina A Suh[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tobias Peikert[SUP] 6 9 10 [/SUP], Matthew S Block[SUP] 6 9 [/SUP], Chien-Te Kent Tseng[SUP] 2 7 11 [/SUP], Gloria R Olivier[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Michael A Barry[SUP] 5 6 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Most gene-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are nonreplicating vectors. They deliver the gene or messenger RNA to the cell to express the spike protein but do not replicate to amplify antigen production. This study tested the utility of replication in a vaccine by comparing replication-defective adenovirus (RD-Ad) and replicating single-cycle adenovirus (SC-Ad) vaccines that express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. SC-Ad produced 100 times more spike protein than RD-Ad and generated significantly higher antibodies against the spike protein than RD-Ad after single immunization of Ad-permissive hamsters. SC-Ad-generated antibodies climbed over 14 weeks after single immunization and persisted for more than 10 months. When the hamsters were challenged 10.5 months after single immunization, a single intranasal or intramuscular immunization with SC-Ad-Spike reduced SARS-CoV-2 viral loads and damage in the lungs and preserved body weight better than vaccination with RD-Ad-Spike. This demonstrates the utility of harnessing replication in vaccines to amplify protection against infectious diseases.
 
Back
Top Bottom