• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Scand J Work Environ Health . Healthcare workers' SARS-CoV-2 infection rates during the second wave of the pandemic: follow-up study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Scand J Work Environ Health


. 2022 Jul 3;4049.
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4049. Online ahead of print.
Healthcare workers' SARS-CoV-2 infection rates during the second wave of the pandemic: follow-up study


Anne Mette Würtz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Martin B Kinnerup, Kirsten Pugdahl, Vivi Schlünssen, Jesper Medom Vestergaard, Kent Nielsen, Christine Cramer, Jens Peter Bonde, Karin Biering, Ole Carstensen, Karoline Kærgaard Hansen, Annett Dalbøge, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Mette Lausten Hansen, Ane Marie Thulstrup, Else Toft Würtz, Mona Kjærsgaard, Mette Wulf Christensen, Henrik Albert Kolstad



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess if, during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers had increased severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates, following close contact with patients, co-workers and persons outside work with COVID-19.
Methods: A follow-up study of 5985 healthcare workers from Denmark was conducted between November 2020 and April 2021 and provided day-to-day information on COVID-19 contacts. SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined by the first positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test ever. Data was analyzed in multivariable Poisson regression models.
Results: The SARS-CoV-2 infection rates following close contact 3-7 days earlier with patients, co-workers and persons outside work with COVID-19 were 153.7, 240.8, and 728.1 per 100 000 person-days, respectively. This corresponded with age, sex, month, number of PCR tests and mutually adjusted incidence rate ratios of 3.17 [40 cases, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.15-4.66], 2.54 (10 cases, 95% CI 1.30-4.96) and 17.79 (35 cases, 95% CI 12.05-26.28). The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was thus lower, but the absolute numbers affected was higher following COVID-19 contact at work than COVID-19 contact off work.
Conclusions: Despite strong focus on preventive measures during the second wave of the pandemic, healthcare workers were still at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection when in close contact with patients or co-workers with COVID-19. There is a need for increased focus on infection control measures in order to secure healthcare workers' health and reduce transmission into the community during ongoing and future waves of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections.
 
Back
Top Bottom