• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sale of raw milk could soon be legal in Louisiana, despite bird flu outbreak in cattle

Mary Wilson

Well-known member
The law legalizes raw milk sales, but requires "not for human consumption" labeling.

​Jun 10, 2024​
By EMILY WOODRUFF

A bill legalizing the sale of raw milk in Louisiana is set to become law, despite warnings from state and federal agencies that consuming it is risky amid an outbreak of H5N1, or bird flu, in cattle.

The bill, HB467, passed unanimously in the House to a chorus of mooing lawmakers last month. The bill was later watered down in the Senate after the Louisiana Department of Health estimated it would take roughly $900,000 a year and seven employees to regulate raw milk for human consumption.

Eventually, legislators agreed raw milk could be sold, but only with labels that say "not for human consumption" and warn of the potential for "harmful bacteria." Lawmakers acknowledged that the label likely would not prevent people from drinking it, which is legal.

"I don't care what you do with it after you get it," said Sen. Stewart Cathey, R-Monroe, during a Senate Agriculture meeting.​ ...

https://www.nola.com/news/healthcar...cle_ef80a924-19c6-11ef-af97-1b2e6a39985a.html
 
Back
Top