• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Safety and Cross‐Reactive Immunogenicity of Candidate AS03‐Adjuvanted Prepandemic H5N1 Influenza Vaccines: A Randomized Controlled Phase 1/2 Trial in

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
he Journal of Infectious Diseases 2010;201:1644?1653
? 2010 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
0022-1899/2010/20111-0007$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/652701
MAJOR ARTICLE
Safety and Cross‐Reactive Immunogenicity of Candidate AS03‐Adjuvanted Prepandemic H5N1 Influenza Vaccines: A Randomized Controlled Phase 1/2 Trial in Adults

Joanne M. Langley,1

Louise Frenette,3

Linda Ferguson,2

Dennis Riff,4

Eric Sheldon,5

George Risi,6

Casey Johnson,7

Ping Li,8

Richard Kenney,9

Bruce Innis,8 and

Louis Fries9

1Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre Halifax, Halifax, and 2Colchester Research Group, Truro, Nova Scotia, and 3Q & T Research, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; 4Advanced Clinical Research Institute, Anaheim, California; 5Miami Research Associates, Miami, Florida; 6Infectious Disease Specialists, Missoula, Montana; 7Johnson County Clinical Trials, Lenexa, Kansas; 8GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 9GlaxoSmithKline, Columbia, South Carolina

Background.The tocopherol‐based oil‐in‐water emulsion adjuvant system family (AS03) improves antigen sparing with split‐virion H5N1 influenza vaccines, representing an important development for pandemic preparedness. In this phase 1/2 randomized, controlled, observer‐blinded study in 680 adults, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of A/Indonesia/5/05 H5N1 (IBCDC‐RG2, clade 2.1) prepandemic candidate vaccines produced at 2 separate manufacturing sites.

Methods.Two doses, each of which contained 3.75 μg of hemagglutinin antigen, were given 21 days apart either without adjuvant or with an adjuvant system containing 11.86 mg or 5.93 mg of tocopherol (AS03).

Results.The AS03‐adjuvanted A/Indonesia/05/2005 (NIBRG‐14) vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than nonadjuvanted vaccine in homologous assays. Neutralizing cross‐clade immunogenicity against clades 1, 2.2, and 2.3 was demonstrated at day 42 with all vaccines; at 6 months, seroconversion rates were highest for clade 2.2 (60.7%) and for clade 1 (38.3%). Adjuvantation was associated with increased short‐term injection‐site reactions (pain) in 80% of participants, with such reactions assessed as being of grade 3 severity for 4.0% of doses. No other safety or reactogenicity concerns were identified over 6 months of follow‐up.

Conclusions.Humoral responses against the adjuvanted 3.75‐μg hemagglutinin antigen vaccines from both manufacturing sites fulfilled European and US licensure criteria for immunogenicity for influenza vaccines.


http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/652701
 
Back
Top Bottom