• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Rev Med Virol . The effectiveness of non-contact thermal screening as a means of identifying cases of Covid-19: a rapid review of the evidence

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Rev Med Virol


. 2021 Jul;31(4):e2192.
doi: 10.1002/rmv.2192. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
The effectiveness of non-contact thermal screening as a means of identifying cases of Covid-19: a rapid review of the evidence


Karen Cardwell[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Karen Jordan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paula Byrne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Susan M Smith[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patricia Harrington[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mairin Ryan[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Michelle O'Neill[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of this rapid review is to summarise the evidence on non-contact thermal screening as a method through which to identify cases and reduce the spread of coronavirus disease (Covid-19). The rapid review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines, with a systematic search of published peer-reviewed articles and non-peer-reviewed pre-prints undertaken from 1 January 2000 up to 7 October 2020. Eleven studies were included. One observational study and two mathematical modelling studies were conducted in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic; the remaining studies were conducted during the influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 (n = 7) or middle east respiratory syndrome (n = 1) pandemics. One systematic review and three rapid reviews were identified and screened for relevant studies. Evidence on the effectiveness of thermal screening contained within this review was limited to points of entry (i.e., airports); thus the applicability to other community settings is uncertain. Thermal screening, implemented as part of a composite of screening measures (self-report of relevant symptoms, contact/travel history), was ineffective in identifying infectious individuals and limiting the spread of disease. Based on limited, low certainty evidence, non-contact thermal screening is ineffective in limiting the spread of Covid-19.

Keywords: Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; mass screening; thermal screening.
 
Back
Top Bottom