• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Response to a DNA vaccine against the H5N1 virus depending on the chicken line and number of doses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Virol J. 2020 May 7;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01335-9.
Response to a DNA vaccine against the H5N1 virus depending on the chicken line and number of doses.


Kalenik BM[SUP]1[/SUP], G?ra-Sochacka A[SUP]1[/SUP], Stachyra A[SUP]1[/SUP], Olszewska-Tomczyk M[SUP]2[/SUP], Fogtman A[SUP]1[/SUP], Sawicka R[SUP]1[/SUP], Śmietanka K[SUP]2[/SUP], Sirko A[SUP]3[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Avian influenza virus infections cause significant economic losses on poultry farms and pose the threat of a possible pandemic outbreak. Routine vaccination of poultry against avian influenza is not recommended in Europe, however it has been ordered in some other countries, and more countries are considering use of the avian influenza vaccine as a component of their control strategy. Although a variety of such vaccines have been tested, most research has concentrated on specific antibodies and challenge experiments.
METHODS:

We monitored the transcriptomic response to a DNA vaccine encoding hemagglutinin from the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in the spleens of broiler and layer chickens. Moreover, in layer chickens the response to one and two doses of the vaccine was compared.
RESULTS:

All groups of birds immunized with two doses of the vaccine responded at the humoral level by producing specific anti-hemagglutinin antibodies. A response to the vaccine was also detected in the spleen transcriptomes. Differential expression of many genes encoding noncoding RNA and proteins functionally connected to the neuroendocrine-immune system was observed in different immunized groups.
CONCLUSION:

Broiler chickens showed a higher number and wider range of fold-changes in the transcriptional response than laying hens.



KEYWORDS:

Broilers; Chicken; DNA vaccine; Influenza; Layers; SPF chickens; Spleen transcriptome


PMID:32381003DOI:10.1186/s12985-020-01335-9
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom