• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Respir Res . Evaluation of the influenza vaccine protection in the house dust mite-induced chronic allergic asthma mice model and the evaluation of

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Respir Res


. 2025 Apr 10;26(1):132.
doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03209-6. Evaluation of the influenza vaccine protection in the house dust mite-induced chronic allergic asthma mice model and the evaluation of squalene oil in water emulsion as an adjuvant candidate

So Yeon Ahn[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thi Len Ho[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eun-Ju Ko[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of influenza vaccination in asthma patients, the efficacy of this vaccine in asthma has not been well elucidated. We aimed to compare the efficacy of an influenza vaccine of the asthmatic and control mice. We also evaluated the efficacy of AddaVax™ as an adjuvant candidate, which is equivalent to the MF59 influenza vaccine adjuvant in the elderly.
Method: House dust mite extracts were intranasally injected into six-week-old female BALB/c mice to induce chronic allergic asthma. Antibody responses after split-inactivated A/Puerto Rico/8/34 H1N1 influenza vaccination with or without AddaVax™ adjuvant were measured using ELISA. Homologous viral protection was determined by measuring the survival rate, lung inflammation level, and lung virus titer after challenge with the human influenza virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1. Antigen-specific T cell responses were determined using flow cytometry.
Result: The chronic asthma mice immunized with split-inactivated A/Puerto Rico/8/34 H1N1 influenza vaccine showed significant weight loss and higher lung viral load after homologous influenza infection than naïve vaccinated mice. Antigen-specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a production did not differ between the naïve and asthma mice. However, serum HI titer was lower in asthma-vaccinated mice after infection. The application of AddaVax™ to a vaccine for mice with asthma enhanced the efficacy of homologous antiviral protection but elicited eosinophil infiltration in the lungs after homologous influenza virus infection.
Conclusion: The immune response after split inactivated A/PR8 vaccine differed between asthma and naïve mice, particularly in terms of antibody activity and T cell populations. This study enhances our understanding of how asthma status may influence the effectiveness of influenza vaccine and offers insights into the AddaVax™-induced eosinophilic inflammation, guiding the development of virus vaccine strategies for both healthy individuals and asthma patients.

Keywords: AddaVax™; Adjuvant; Asthma; HDM-induced asthma; Influenza vaccine; T cell.

 
Back
Top Bottom