• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Respir Investig . Antibody responses to second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Respir Investig


. 2022 Dec 15;S2212-5345(22)00156-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2022.11.005. Online ahead of print.
Antibody responses to second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment


Daisuke Narita[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Risa Ebina-Shibuya[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eisaku Miyauchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yoko Tsukita[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ryota Saito[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Koji Murakami[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nozomu Kimura[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hisatoshi Sugiura[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Several reports have revealed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection tends to have more severe outcomes in cancer patients. Although vaccination reduces the risk of severe disease, data on antibody titers achieved by vaccination is scarce in cancer patients.
Methods: We collected 79 blood samples (69 lung cancer patients and 10 control individuals) and conducted an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay to compare the antibody titer achieved with current treatment. Sixty-eight patients (86%) received the BNT162 mRNA vaccine and 11 (14%) received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. They were categorized according to the current treatment: control individuals without cancer (cohort A), lung cancer patients who were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort B), immunotherapy (cohort C), combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cohort D), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cohort E), and radiation therapy (cohort F).
Results: Among 69 lung cancer patients (cohort B-F), 57 (83%) had adenocarcinoma, and 66 (96%) had advanced-stage cancer. In the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay, the antibody titer was significantly lower in lung cancer patients than in control individuals (p = 0.01). The median antibody titers were 161 AU/ml in control individuals and 59.9 AU/ml in lung cancer patients.
Conclusions: Antibody titers after the second vaccination were lower in cancer patients than those in healthy individuals. Our findings provide essential information for understanding the benefits and necessity of additional vaccination to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung cancer patients.

Keywords: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay; BNT162 mRNA vaccine; Lung cancer; SARS-CoV-2; mRNA-1273 vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom