tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Respir Care
. 2021 Aug 31;respcare.09064.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.09064. Online ahead of print.
Respiratory Mechanics in a Cohort of Critically Ill Subjects With COVID-19 Infection
August Longino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Toni Riveros[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Erik Risa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chris Hebert[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joshua Krieger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Steven Coppess[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Flynn McGuire[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pavan K Bhatraju[SUP] 2 [/SUP], James Town[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nicholas J Johnson[SUP] 2 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and receive invasive mechanical ventilation. Much remains unknown about their respiratory mechanics, including the trajectories of pulmonary compliance and P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , the prognostic value of these parameters, and the effects of prone positioning. We described respiratory mechanics among subjects with COVID-19 who were intubated during the first month of hospitalization.
Methods: We included patients with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated between February and May 2020. Daily values of pulmonary compliance, P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , and the use of prone positioning were abstracted from electronic medical records. The trends were analyzed separately over days 1-10 and days 1-35 of intubation, stratified by prone positioning use, survival, and initial P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] .
Results: Among 49 subjects on mechanical ventilation day 1, the mean compliance was 41 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O, decreasing to 25 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O by day 14, the median duration of mechanical ventilation. In contrast, the P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] on day 1 was similar to day 14. The overall mean compliance was greater among the non-survivors versus the survivors (27 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O vs 24 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O; P = .005), whereas P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] was higher among the survivors versus the non-survivors over days 1-10 (159 mm Hg vs 138 mm Hg; P = .002) and days 1-35 (175 mm Hg vs 153 mm Hg; P < .001). The subjects who underwent early prone positioning had lower compliance during days 1-10 (27 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O vs 33 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O; P < .001) and lower P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] values over days 1-10 (139.9 mm Hg vs 167.4 mm Hg; P < .001) versus those who did not undergo prone positioning. After day 21 of hospitalization, the average compliance of the subjects who had early prone positioning surpassed that of the subjects who did not have prone positioning.
Conclusions: Respiratory mechanics of the subjects with COVID-19 who were on mechanical ventilation were characterized by persistently low respiratory system compliance and P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , similar to ARDS due to other etiologies. The P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] was more tightly associated with mortality than with compliance.
Keywords: COVID-19; PaO2/FIO2 ratio; SARS-CoV-2; hypoxemic respiratory failure; mechanical ventilation; oxygenation; pneumonia; prone positioning; pulmonary compliance; viral.
. 2021 Aug 31;respcare.09064.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.09064. Online ahead of print.
Respiratory Mechanics in a Cohort of Critically Ill Subjects With COVID-19 Infection
August Longino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Toni Riveros[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Erik Risa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chris Hebert[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joshua Krieger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Steven Coppess[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Flynn McGuire[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pavan K Bhatraju[SUP] 2 [/SUP], James Town[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nicholas J Johnson[SUP] 2 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34465572
- DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09064
Abstract
Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and receive invasive mechanical ventilation. Much remains unknown about their respiratory mechanics, including the trajectories of pulmonary compliance and P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , the prognostic value of these parameters, and the effects of prone positioning. We described respiratory mechanics among subjects with COVID-19 who were intubated during the first month of hospitalization.
Methods: We included patients with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated between February and May 2020. Daily values of pulmonary compliance, P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , and the use of prone positioning were abstracted from electronic medical records. The trends were analyzed separately over days 1-10 and days 1-35 of intubation, stratified by prone positioning use, survival, and initial P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] .
Results: Among 49 subjects on mechanical ventilation day 1, the mean compliance was 41 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O, decreasing to 25 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O by day 14, the median duration of mechanical ventilation. In contrast, the P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] on day 1 was similar to day 14. The overall mean compliance was greater among the non-survivors versus the survivors (27 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O vs 24 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O; P = .005), whereas P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] was higher among the survivors versus the non-survivors over days 1-10 (159 mm Hg vs 138 mm Hg; P = .002) and days 1-35 (175 mm Hg vs 153 mm Hg; P < .001). The subjects who underwent early prone positioning had lower compliance during days 1-10 (27 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O vs 33 mL/cm H[SUB]2[/SUB]O; P < .001) and lower P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] values over days 1-10 (139.9 mm Hg vs 167.4 mm Hg; P < .001) versus those who did not undergo prone positioning. After day 21 of hospitalization, the average compliance of the subjects who had early prone positioning surpassed that of the subjects who did not have prone positioning.
Conclusions: Respiratory mechanics of the subjects with COVID-19 who were on mechanical ventilation were characterized by persistently low respiratory system compliance and P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] , similar to ARDS due to other etiologies. The P[SUB]aO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] /F[SUB]IO[SUB]2[/SUB][/SUB] was more tightly associated with mortality than with compliance.
Keywords: COVID-19; PaO2/FIO2 ratio; SARS-CoV-2; hypoxemic respiratory failure; mechanical ventilation; oxygenation; pneumonia; prone positioning; pulmonary compliance; viral.