• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Report finds poor ethics policing at CDC in 2007

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
By MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer - Fri Dec 18, 2:39 PM PST
ATLANTA -



The government's top public health agency frequently failed to police its outside experts for conflicts of interest, according to a new government report released Friday.


The report looked at how well the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention looked for and dealt with conflicts among about 250 scientific experts who served on 17 advisory panels in 2007.

Panel members are supposed to disclose whether they have been paid by ? or own stock in ? drug companies or other entities that might have an interest in the panel's decisions. The panels provide advice to the CDC on topics such as how many people should get vaccinated and guidelines for cancer screenings.


Almost none of the 250 advisers that year properly or completely filled out forms in which they were required to state potential conflicts of interest, according to the report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector General.


The report concluded that the CDC failed to follow-up with some of the experts who disclosed potential conflicts: 85 because of jobs or grants, 28 with stock ownership and 13 who received consulting fees.


more...

http://health.yahoo.com/news/ap/us_med_cdc_ethics.html
 
Back
Top