• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Regional %ILI Generally Improving

JimO

Well-known member
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/regions2008-2009/hhssenusmap.htm

The %ILI in most of the 10 regions in the U.S. have either leveled off or are beginning to decrease, which is odd to me given the number of reports of school absences, community outbreaks, reports of ERs having to set up separate triage areas, and the fact that we are just beginning the flu season.

It is good news, for sure, assuming the %ILI is still a reliable indicator and that infections are actually decreasing. However, I wonder if there are fewer ED or doctor office visits given all the publicity about staying home unless there are serious complications, but not necessarily fewer infections. Otherwise, either there is a lag between current reports of illness and data getting to the CDC from sentinal providers, or there has been a lessoning of the pandemic in the U.S.

I'd also like to see if the number of sentinal providers reporting has gone down. If those who are overwhelmed with patients don't have time to collect the data and send it to the CDC, then this too could make the %ILI data that is reported biased to indicate fewer infections.

Any thoughts?
 
Re: Regional %ILI Generally Improving

From New Jersey,
It seems like a tiny fraction are actually reporting. Has to leave a larger degreee of uncertainty in any calculations.


Sentinel Provider Surveillance
During week 38, 04.15% of sentinel provider patient visits were due to ILI. These data reflect reports
from nine (18%) of the enrolled sentinel providers.

During week 37, 2.75% of sentinel provider patient visits were due to ILI. These data reflect reports from
eighteen (36%) of the enrolled sentinel providers.

http://www.state.nj.us/health/flu/documents/stats08/flummwr_38.pdf
 
Re: Regional %ILI Generally Improving

JimO, your hypothesis about overworked sentinel providers behind in reporting remains a possibility.

I wouldn't put much stock in minor fluctuations - we should expect some random fluctuations on a week to week basis. In almost all of the charts for all regions, the %ILI case is substantially above the baseline. Because we are barely into the next flu season with the %ILI already way above the baseline, I think we will see it go higher in the coming weeks. For me, the long term trend is still up.
 
Back
Top Bottom