• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Reduction of Clostridum Difficile - Cleaning Methods

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=bottom><TD align=left>Research article
</TD><TD align=right><!-- <rdf:RDF xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><cc:Work rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/61"><cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/></cc:Work><cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"><cc:permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Reproduction"/><cc:permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Distribution"/><cc:requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Notice"/><cc:requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Attribution"/><cc:permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/DerivativeWorks"/></cc:License><item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/61"><title>Reduction of Clostridium Difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods</title><dc:title>Reduction of Clostridium Difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods</dc:title><dc:creator>Eckstein, Brittany C</dc:creator><dc:creator>Adams, Daniel A</dc:creator><dc:creator>Eckstein, Elizabeth C</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rao, Agam</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sethi, Ajay K</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yadavalli, Gopala K</dc:creator><dc:creator>Donskey, Curtis J</dc:creator><dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1186/1471-2334-7-61</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>info:pmid/17584935</dc:identifier><dc:source>BMC Infectious Diseases 2007, 7:61</dc:source><dc:date>2007-06-21</dc:date>
BMC Infectious Diseases</prism:publicationName>
2007-06-21</prism:publicationDate>
7</prism:volume>
1</prism:number>
Research article</prism:section>
61</prism:startingPage></item></rdf:RDF> -->.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Reduction of Clostridium Difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods
Brittany C Eckstein<SUP>1 </SUP> , Daniel A Adams<SUP>1 </SUP> , Elizabeth C Eckstein<SUP>2 </SUP> , Agam Rao<SUP>3 </SUP> , Ajay K Sethi<SUP>4 </SUP> , Gopala K Yadavalli<SUP>1 </SUP> and Curtis J Donskey<SUP>1 </SUP>
<SUP>1</SUP>Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd., Cleveland, Ohio, USA
<SUP>2</SUP>Infection Control Department, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd., Cleveland, Ohio, USA
<SUP>3</SUP>Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 10000 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
<SUP>4</SUP>Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

BMC Infectious Diseases 2007, 7:61 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-7-61

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/61

<TABLE class=smalltext><TBODY><TR><TD>Received</TD><TD width=25> </TD><TD>6 December 2006</TD></TR><TR><TD>Accepted</TD><TD width=25> </TD><TD>21 June 2007</TD></TR><TR><TD>Published</TD><TD width=25> </TD><TD>21 June 2007</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
? 2007 Eckstein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
</P>



Background
Contaminated environmental surfaces may play an important role in transmission of some healthcare-associated pathogens. In this study, we assessed the adequacy of cleaning practices in rooms of patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization or infection and examined whether an intervention would result in improved decontamination of surfaces.
Methods
During a 6-week period, we cultured commonly touched surfaces (i.e. bedrails, telephones, call buttons, door knobs, toilet seats, and bedside tables) in rooms of patients with CDAD and VRE colonization or infection before and after housekeeping cleaning, and again after disinfection with 10% bleach performed by the research staff. After the housekeeping staff received education and feedback, additional cultures were collected before and after housekeeping cleaning during a 10-week follow-up period.
Results
Of the 17 rooms of patients with VRE colonization or infection, 16 (94%) had one or more positive environmental cultures before cleaning versus 12 (71%) after housekeeping cleaning (p = 0.125), whereas none had positive cultures after bleach disinfection by the research staff (p < 0.001). Of the 9 rooms of patients with CDAD, 100% had positive cultures prior to cleaning versus 7 (78%) after housekeeping cleaning (p = 0.50), whereas only 1 (11%) had positive cultures after bleach disinfection by research staff (p = 0.031). After an educational intervention, rates of environmental contamination after housekeeping cleaning were significantly reduced.
Conclusion
Our findings provide additional evidence that simple educational interventions directed at housekeeping staff can result in improved decontamination of environmental surfaces. Such interventions should include efforts to monitor cleaning and disinfection practices and provide feedback to the housekeeping staff.
 
Back
Top