• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Randomized controlled trials for influenza drugs and vaccines: a review of controlled human infection studies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis. 2016 May 18. pii: S1201-9712(16)31056-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.05.013. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Randomized controlled trials for influenza drugs and vaccines: a review of controlled human infection studies.[/h] Balasingam S[SUP]1[/SUP], Wilder-Smith A[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] Controlled human infection, the intentional infection of healthy volunteers, allows disease pathogenesis to be studied and vaccines and therapeutic interventions to be evaluated in a controlled setting. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of countermeasures for influenza that used the experimental human infection platform. Our primary objective was to document the scope of trials to-date and the main efficacy outcome in the trials. Our secondary objective was to assess safety and identify serious adverse events.
[h=4]DESIGN:[/h] We searched PubMed for randomized influenza controlled human challenge studies with predetermined search terms. We excluded review papers, papers without outcomes, community acquired infections, duplicated data, pathogenesis studies and observational studies.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Between 1947 and 2014, 26 randomized controlled trials fit our inclusion criteria. Two thirds of these trials investigated antivirals and one-third influenza vaccines. Among 2,462 subjects inoculated with influenza virus, the incidence of serious adverse events was low (0.04%). These challenge studies helped to down-select three antivirals and one vaccine that were subsequently FDA approved.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Controlled human infection studies are an important research tool in assessing promising influenza vaccines and antivirals. These studies are performed quickly, are cost effective and safe with low serious adverse events incidence.
Copyright ? 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] challenge studies; controlled human infection; influenza; influenza vaccine influenza therapeutics; randomized controlled trials

PMID: 27208631 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom